Reading List: Kentucky Civil War military studies
As you can see by clicking here or on the sidebar link, I have put together various reading lists or links to bibliographical compilations. A recent radio interview with an author sparked me to create a short list of Civil War Kentucky campaign and battle histories. The interviewer made the rather cavalier assertion that Kentucky served as a buffer during the war and saw little fighting. Of course, in broad terms relative to other Border and Upper South states, there is a grain of truth to this but significant campaigns and battles occurred in Kentucky nonetheless, especially during the first two years of the war. Below is a selected reading list of military studies I found useful.
Where is all the Morgan stuff (one might ask)? Truth is, the Morgan literature has never really grabbed me much, beyond the recent Gorin book listed below and an excellent section of James Brewer's Raiders of 1862.
- Perryville: This Grand Havoc of Battle
-- by Kenneth Noe.
- Perryville, Battle for Kentucky -- by Kenneth Hafendorfer.
- The Battle of Wildcat Mountain -- by Kenneth Hafendorfer.
- The Zollie Tree -- by Raymond Myers.
- Mill Springs -- by Kenneth Hafendorfer.
- War in Kentucky: From Shiloh to Perryville
-- by James McDonough.
- The Civil War in Kentucky
-- ed. Kent M. Brown.
- When the Ripe Pears Fell -- by D. Warren Lambert.
- Battle of Richmond, Kentucky -- by Kenneth Hafendorfer.
- Thunder From a Clear Sky -- by Raymond Mulesky.
- Morgan is Coming! -- by Betty J. Gorin.
- A Masterful Retreat -- by Lewis D. Nicholls.
- They Died by Twos and Tens -- by Kenneth Hafendorfer.
- The Battle of Belmont: Grant Strikes South
-- by Nathaniel Cheairs Hughes, Jr.
- Forts Henry and Donelson: The Key to the Confederate Heartland
-- by Benjamin F. Cooling.
- Fort Donelson's Legacy: War and Society in Kentucky and Tennessee, 1862-1863
-- by Benjamin F. Cooling.








2 comments:
What's your opinion of Earl Hess' Banners to the Breeze from the Nebraska Great Campaigns of the Civil War series?
Stephen,
I've read the Hess and Engle volumes. There is certainly nothing wrong with any of them, but I think they are directed toward a certain audience needing a relatively brief but comprehensive synthesis of up to date scholarship of a particular campaign, in lieu of delving into all the specialized studies that surround them. If you are coming from the other direction, they are less useful. That's how I found them anyway.
Drew
Post a Comment