Francis O'Reilly's Malvern Hill study has a release date

Long suffering students of the 1862 Peninsula Campaign series of battles have had two major projects on their minds for a very long time. The first, R.E.L. Krick's massive two-volume history of the Battle of Gaines' Mill, has already been released to universal acclaim. An American Battlefield Trust donation exclusive, it's still unclear if there are plans for a general release in the future (at least I've yet to come across anything said about it publicly). A study as unique and important as that one deserves a wider release, so hopefully that will happen someday.

Getting to the matter at hand, though, the other much-anticipated title of the pair, Frank O'Reilly's Malvern Hill battle history, has just received a release window from the publisher. If you follow Savas Beatie on social media, you already know that Retreat from Victory: The Battle of Malvern Hill and the End of the Seven Days, July 1, 1862 is scheduled for a Spring '26 release. Online retailers currently have the date as May 15, but, as such things go, that may change.

It won't have the girth of the Krick set, but it will come in at a tome-like 500+ pages. The Sneden watercolor was a great choice for the cover art, too.

Review - "The Surgeon's Battle: How Medicine Won the Vicksburg Campaign and Changed the Civil War" by Lindsay Rae Smith Privette

[The Surgeon's Battle: How Medicine Won the Vicksburg Campaign and Changed the Civil War by Lindsay Rae Smith Privette (University of North Carolina Press, 2025). Softcover, illustrations, tables, endnotes, bibliography, index. Pages main/total:xiv,154/221. ISBN:978-1-4696-9027-8. $29.95]

In the twelve months following the July 21, 1861 Battle of Bull Run, environmental extremes significantly impacted a number of major Civil War areas of operation. In the process, those outside pressures further taxed medical services already unprepared to handle the conflict's unprecedented scale of battlefield casualties. In the wake of hard-earned lessons in handling the sick and wounded, the Union Army systematized a number of medical reforms under fresh leadership. Many were the handiwork of Surgeon General William Hammond and Army of the Potomac Medical Director Jonathan Letterman. The westward spread of these much-needed changes, in combination with popular outcry over messy casualty management after the Fort Donelson and Shiloh campaigns, resulted in notable improvements in how U.S. Grant's Army of the Tennessee managed the health and fighting trim of its soldiers during the long December 1862-July 1863 Vicksburg Campaign. That transformation is the subject of historian Lindsay Rae Smith Privette's The Surgeon's Battle: How Medicine Won the Vicksburg Campaign and Changed the Civil War, which examines the medical department's impact upon the course of arguably the conflict's most environmentally challenging military campaign.

Privette shows that by the time Fifteenth Corps commander William T. Sherman launched his December 1862 Chickasaw Bayou operation the Hammond/Letterman reforms were already taking shape. Among the most important initiatives were the reorganization of medical care and distribution of medical supplies. Previously done at the regimental level, it was determined that effectiveness and efficiency demanded that those tasks to be more centralized at the division level, and actual practice confirmed that wisdom. Outfitting well-stocked hospital ships to bed, treat, and transport sick and wounded soldiers was another priority that greatly benefited the health of the western army. As the author notes, perhaps least appreciated among the new mandates was the marked improvement in record-keeping, which was abysmally neglected after Donelson and Shiloh. This system allowed patient location to be tracked as well as the progress of care. Implementation made it possible for the first time to fully document and closely follow case studies that would later be used to improve the quality of wound and disease treatment. Chickasaw Bayou was, by any estimation, a complete military failure, but Privette argues that it did mark a turning point in medical service improvements, though there was still more left to be done.

The many ways in which Northern aid societies enhanced Union soldier health and welfare are well described in the literature, as is the fact that those well-intentioned civilian activities frequently clashed with military administrators, who also didn't appreciate the frequent criticisms that aid society inspectors aimed in their direction. Privette remarks upon the administrative clashes between the army and government-approved soldier aid agencies such as the United States Sanitary Commission (USSC) and Western Sanitary Commission (WSC), showing that their conflicts extended well beyond mere jealousies over authority and into practical matters of managing soldier health. Asserting control over bodily care was also a major issue down the army chain of command, where military priorities frequently clashed with rank and file health concerns. At the bottom of it all was the private soldier, whose options for what we today call "self-care" were limited. After Chickasaw Bayou, Army of the Tennessee soldiers camped along the swamps, bayous, and levees of eastern Louisiana suffered terribly from disease and the elements, and Privette's findings amplify much of what fellow historian Eric Michael Burke revealed in his excellent, award-winning Fifteenth Corps study published in 2022. According to both authors, from the shocking scale of non-combat losses incurred to the widespread believe among the common soldiers that their own health needs, indeed the value of their very lives, lay at or near the bottom of their corps commander's list of military priorities, it was clear that much needed to be done in order to restore faith in the army's high command. General John A. McClernand's Thirteenth Corps also enters the discussion, and the book helpfully reminds readers that heated accusations back and forth in regard to McClernand's alleged neglect of his corps' medical services contributed heavily to the rising friction between the general and army commander Grant.

Citing military necessity and the impossibility of avoiding the ravages of regional endemic disease, Grant and Sherman refused to abandon the Vicksburg canal project that ended up stretching between January and March 1863, even insisting that sickness and loss claims over that period were greatly exaggerated. The army's medical department concurred, and Privette acknowledges the difficulties involved with reconciling critical claims originating from the rank and file level against those from defensive-minded top leadership. Nevertheless, regardless of the weight one might assign to the various factors involved, it was clear to all that general health (measured by the army sick list) had improved substantially by April.

In contrast to other histories of the Vicksburg Campaign, Privette presents an interesting angle centered around the environmental context of the military operation. The cold rains and flooding of the winter months (which restricted camp space, contaminated water, and presented troops with conditions rife for respiratory and intestinal disease) and the summer months (which exposed the army to peak malaria and yellow fever) were essentially a extra defender on the Confederate side. With those environmental obstacles in mind, the author notes that Grant crossed the Mississippi, swept across the state's interior, and invested Vicksburg at essentially the perfect time for the health of his men, the month of May being right between the two aforementioned seasonal extremes. While liberal foraging largely compensated for the inland movement's imperfect supply line situation, as least for the short term, other challenges to soldier mind and body needed to be addressed. Appropriately stressed in the study is the impact that regular sleep deprivation during the rapid marches of May had on the men's immune systems, although it is also acknowledged that the May victories had uplifting follow-on psychological and physical endurance effects. The biggest potential non-combat killer during the active phase of the campaign was high heat exacerbated by the punishing pace of the army's advance. Denied adequate rest, shade, cooling, and fluid replacement, soldiers struck with heat exhaustion resorted to straggling to both save themselves for the present and recharge themselves for the future when they rejoined their units.

Though General Grant had a reputation for being a strong supporter of the medical service, his army did prioritize ammunition over medical supplies when it came to utilizing the limited transportation that accompanied the army across the river into Mississippi. This isolation had the potential for disaster, as, just like it was for supplies, the army's tenuous path of supply and communications back to Grand Gulf would have been dangerously insecure if the army was bogged down into static, high-casualty warfare before reaching Vicksburg itself. Fortunately, Union casualties were manageable for the series of battles fought between Port Gibson and Big Black River, and the failed assaults that caused half of the army's total casualties for May occurred after establishment of a secure logistical base nearby on the Yazoo River had been assured. It is also noted that the administration and requisition policies of the army's recently appointed medical director, Madison Mills, had resulted in medical supply stockpiles in close proximity west of the Mississippi that were sufficient to handle the influx of patients that preceded the investment of Vicksburg.

The author also sees the geographical and logistical isolation that Grant's army operated under during much of the Vicksburg Campaign as having positive aspects. For the medical services, they were able to go about their business with less direct civilian and political interference than ever before, and Privette also considers that isolation an opportunity for surgeons to improve their self-reliance in ways that would serve them well over the balance of their Civil War careers. It is also noteworthy that case studies authored by Vicksburg Campaign surgeons as well as other documentation created in fulfillment of Mills's new requirements formed significant contributions to the medical literature.

After the failure of the May 19 and 22 assaults, the beginning of summer siege operations heralded the return of health concerns inherent to static warfare, namely camp sanitation and contaminated water. From May into June, the flooding, cold, and wetness that caused so many problems was replaced by spring into summer challenges such as high heat, humidity, and dried up water sources. However, as Privette notes, the medical corps's enhanced operations over previous months resulted in improved care, better defined authority, and refined administration, and the army's close proximity to its river communications made possible a constant flow of medical and aid society supplies along with rapid evacuation of the most ill and most severely wounded soldiers.

Lest one think that weather changes and other environmental factors chiefly explained the army's healthier state, Privette notes that private-sphere medical inspectors previously critical of the army, such as physicians employed by the USSC and WSC, abruptly changed their tune after witnessing the surprisingly (in their view) strong health of the soldiers besieging Vicksburg and improved efficiency of army medical services. Rather than try to block civilian aid workers altogether, Grant sagely facilitated aid society medical supply supplementation with the caveat that it be tightly regulated by army officials. The reshaped relationship worked well, and, in the author's view, the army at Vicksburg experienced far less civilian interference and authority conflicts than it did during the contentious aftermath of Shiloh.

By June, however, malarial diseases and diarrhea/dysentery exploded among the heavily reinforced Vicksburg besiegers, with total sick numbers double what they were during the earlier canal-building winter. Nevertheless, only the worst cases were evacuated to general hospitals upriver, and the new division and corps field hospitals (with assistance from the hospital ships) were able to keep the temporarily disabled soldiery nearby and, working together, managed the army's health well enough to earn credit for being a strong sustaining force along the army's path to final victory. Aiding those efforts, supplies and medicine (one of the most critical being quinine) flowed into the field hospitals via the Milliken's Bend transit depots with noteworthy, albeit imperfect, consistency.

During the siege itself, oppressive heat and humidity affected both sides regardless of the impression that southerners were more physically accustomed to it. With the besieging army swelling to 77,000 men, getting sufficient supplies of potable water was paramount, and both sides utilized the nearby Mississippi River as a supplement to local sources. Just as important as medical care for Grant's soldiers was the positive effect the practice of regular unit rotation into and out of the trenches had on the men's physical and mental well-being. The Confederate defenders did not have that luxury. Though drawing detailed comparisons between Union and Confederate medical services lies beyond the scope of this study, it is clear that by the end of the siege, when a third of the defenders were in hospital and much of the rest seriously debilitated by constant front line duty, the "surgeon's battle" was one that the Confederates could not have hoped to match.

The Surgeon's Battle: How Medicine Won the Vicksburg Campaign and Changed the Civil War represents a noteworthy addition to the medical services history of the Civil War. Keeping in mind the environmental extremes within which the Vicksburg Campaign was fought as well as period limitations in the scientific knowledge of disease processes and transmission, Privette's study nevertheless successfully argues that Grant's Army of the Tennessee incorporated improvements in medical department organization and practices that were numerous and significant enough to mitigate the effects those unavoidable factors had on soldier health and fighting efficiency. While the subtitle's lofty claim that medicine "won" the campaign is certainly attention-grabbing, it is actually more representative of the book's content and interpretation to maintain that advancements in Union Army medicine "helped win" the contest for Vicksburg. That more measured conceptualization, as developed by Privette, is persuasive.

Booknotes: They Fought Like Veterans

New Arrival:

• They Fought Like Veterans: The Military History of the Civil War in the Indian Territory by Michael J. Manning (Prairie Star Music & Pub, 2025).

From the description: "The Civil War within the Indian Territory represented a peripheral aspect of the broader conflict, situated in a less prominent region of the Trans-Mississippi West. The area did not witness significant battles or the emergence of notable military leaders; indeed, many senior officers from both Union and Confederate armies were assigned to this region following unsuccessful campaigns further east. However, the intensity of animosity and violence in the Indian Territory was unparalleled compared to other Civil War regions."

Currently, the most comprehensive, up-to-date scholarly history of the Civil War in Indian Territory is Mary Jane Warde's impressive 2013 study When the Wolf Came: The Civil War and the Indian Territory. That is a huge subject to try to cram into a single volume, and, while Warde was very successful in taking on that tall task, it was only possible to provide very limited overviews of the many campaigns and battles fought inside and directly adjacent to the territory. Those topics, many of which continue to be neglected in the literature at large, are the primary focus of Michael Manning's They Fought Like Veterans: The Military History of the Civil War in the Indian Territory.

According to Manning's introduction, the book can be divided into three parts. The first three chapters "describe the origins of the Five Civilized Tribes, their "Trails of Tears" to their new homes in today's Oklahoma, and the effects of the Southern secession movement upon these Indian nations" (pg. 5). More from the description: "Most of the Five Civilized Tribes-Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Seminole-had resided in the territory for less than a quarter-century. While initial support among these nations leaned toward the Southern Confederacy, consensus was lacking, leading to internal divisions. These splits closely mirrored earlier fractures between pro-treaty members (predominantly of mixed ancestry) and anti-removal members (primarily full-blooded), divisions that originated during the 1820s and 1830s after implementation of the Indian Removal Acts. Relocation moved these nations into what became known as Indian Territory, now largely comprising the State of Oklahoma. Many tribal members, having assimilated aspects of Southern culture prior to removal, had become slaveholders."

The second part, comprising the bulk of the nearly 600-page study, "describes the military actions that occurred in an around the Indian Territory, the troops involved, and the battles they fought" (pg. 5). The text, formatted in a double-column narrative that extensively incorporates quoted passages from primary sources, is supplemented by a multitude of photographic images and supported by numerous maps of all scales.

The final, and shortest, part of the book addresses the Reconstruction period and the negotiations of new treaties between the various tribes and the US government.

Booknotes: Moses Jacob Ezekiel

New Arrival:

• Moses Jacob Ezekiel: Jewish, Confederate, Expatriate Sculptor by Samantha Baskind (Penn St UP, 2025)

At least in American popular memory, the names of much-heralded native sculptors of the past are far less commonly remembered today than are other fine artists such as painters, performers, and literary figures. This is the case even though their works were routinely placed in prominent public spaces free for all to visit. Richmond-born Moses Ezekiel (1844-1917), whose active life straddled the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, certainly fits this bill.

From the description: "How is it that the prolific nineteenth-century sculptor Moses Jacob Ezekiel is largely forgotten today? Ezekiel was the first renowned Jewish American artist and one of the most popular artist-celebrities of his day. In terms of drama, his life story rivals Alexander Hamilton’s. Ezekiel fought for the Confederacy at the Battle of New Market as a teenager and was friends with Robert E. Lee."

I wonder to what degree Ezekiel being an expatriate (1868-1917) for nearly his entire artist career, more than four decades of which was spent in Rome, impacted how little he is remembered in his home country. Regardless, Ezekiel was clearly very well received abroad. More from the description: "After the war, he established himself as an artist in Rome, where he was honored by European royalty and enjoyed friendships with the likes of Franz Liszt, Queen Margherita, and Kaiser Wilhelm II." According to the artist's latest biographer, Samantha Baskind, Ezekiel's Confederate past, however, has tended to overshadow his work, which included over one hundred sculptures.

Baskind's Moses Jacob Ezekiel: Jewish, Confederate, Expatriate Sculptor "resurrects this complicated artist’s life and work and presents the fascinating details of how his sculptures were commissioned and made." Utilizing "a wealth of primary sources," her study "shows how Ezekiel’s sculptures shed light on a range of issues, including the modernization of American Jewry, radical changes in the art world concerning style and patronage, and Civil War commemoration. The conflicting allegiances that motivated Ezekiel’s statues―his conservative Confederate leanings alongside his liberal views on peace, Judaism, and religious liberty―make him an intriguing lens through which to understand nineteenth-century transatlantic culture and history."

It is a beautifully presented book, with thick, glossy paper stock and 100 B&W illustrations (some full-page in size), most of which feature high-res images of Ezekiel's sculpture art. Chapters are organized by theme, with the final one addressing Ezekiel's Confederate soldier experience, perspective, and art legacy.

As "historians are tasked to tell the entire story" (pg. xii), Baskind's book "provides a complete picture of Ezekiel’s oeuvre and his renowned home studio, which drew international visitors. It will appeal to readers interested in art history, Jewish studies, Civil War studies, American studies, and public monuments."

Coming Soon (November '25 Edition)

Scheduled for NOV 2025¹:
• The Day They Hanged Old Brown: The Making of Celebrity and Martyrdom in the Civil War Era by John Van Atta.
• Richmond Views the West: Politics and Perceptions in the Confederate Capital by Larry Daniel.
• The Devil’s Own Purgatory: The United States Mississippi River Squadron in the Civil War by Robert Gudmestad.
• The Greatest Calamity: Tennessee in the Civil War Era by John Fowler.
• The The Old Alcalde: Life and Times of a Texas Fire-Eater, Oran Milo Roberts by John Adams.
• Tar Heel Civil War Flags: The Collection of the North Carolina Museum of History by Tom Belton.
• War Fought and Felt: The Emotional Motivations of Confederate Soldiers by Joshua Shiver.
• From Gray to Blue: Galvanized Yankees in the American Civil War by Patrick Garrow.
• Every Revolution Was First a Thought: The Civil War and Transcendentalism in Transatlantic Context by Aren Craig.
• Three Roads to Gettysburg: Meade, Lee, Lincoln, and the Battle That Changed the War, the Speech That Changed the Nation by Tim McGrath.
• Little Round Top at Gettysburg: A Reassessment of July 2, 1863 by Joseph Boslet.

¹ - These monthly release lists are not meant to be exhaustive compilations of non-fiction releases. They do not include reprints that are not significantly revised/expanded, special editions not distributed to reviewers, children's books, and digital-only titles. Works that only tangentially address the war years are also generally excluded. Inevitably, one or more titles on this list will get a rescheduled release (and they do not get repeated later), so revisiting the past few "Coming Soon" posts is the best way to pick up stragglers.

Booknotes: Fighting with the Past

New Arrival:

• Fighting with the Past: How Seventeenth-Century History Shaped the American Civil War by Aaron Sheehan-Dean (UNC Press, 2025).

A work of "comparative intellectual history," Aaron Sheehan-Dean's Fighting with the Past: How Seventeenth-Century History Shaped the American Civil War explores the ways in which Civil War-period Americans "used the past to understand and traverse their turbulent present." In this case, the reference is to Britain's bloody internal conflicts that played out concurrently with the expansion of English settlement of North America.

From the description: "(N)ineteenth-century Americans were especially conversant with narratives of the English Civil Wars of the 1600s. Northerners and Southerners alike drew from histories of the English past to make sense of their own conflict, interpreting the events of the past in drastically different ways." According to Sheehan-Dean, factions that emerged during America's Civil War came to identify with those of their clashing forebears. "Confederates, for example, likened themselves to England’s Royalists (also known as Cavaliers), hoping to preserve a social order built on hierarchy and claiming the right to resist what they perceived as radicals' assaults on tradition. Meanwhile, conservative Northerners painted President Lincoln as a tyrant in the mold of English Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell, while radical abolitionists drew inspiration from Cromwell and sought to rebuild the South as Cromwell had attempted with Ireland."

The field of Civil War memory centers itself upon interpreting the ways in which the postwar populations of both sections, from Reconstruction through to today, came to reckon with the national past. In contrast, Sheehan-Dean takes a novel tack by shifting the posts two hundred years in the other direction. More: "Surveying two centuries of history-making and everyday engagement with historical thought, Sheehan-Dean convincingly argues that history itself was a battlefront of the American Civil War, with narratives of the past exercising surprising agency in interpretations of the nineteenth-century present. Sheehan-Dean’s discoveries provide an entirely fresh perspective on the role of historical memory in the Civil War era and offer a broader meditation on the construction and uses of history itself."

Review - "John Frémont’s 100 Days: Clashes and Convictions in Civil War Missouri" by Gregory Wolk

[John Frémont’s 100 Days: Clashes and Convictions in Civil War Missouri by Gregory Wolk (Missouri Historical Society Press, 2025). Paperback, 3 maps, photos, illustrations, chapter notes, appendix section, bibliography, index. Pages main/total:190/216. ISBN:979-8-9855716-5-3. $22]

Students of nineteenth-century European history are well versed in the details of Napoleon's famous Hundred Days. It was a wildly tumultuous time that witnessed the former emperor's dramatic escape from exile, his return to power as the leader of France, abject defeat at Waterloo, final abdication, and restoration of the Bourbon monarchy. Less than fifty years later during the American Civil War, William Dorsheimer, a former major on the staff of Major General John C. Fremont, referenced that earlier period when searching for a catchy title for his own history of his chief's brief time at the head of the Union Army's Department of the West. Published in three parts by the Atlantic Monthly in early 1862, Dorsheimer's "Fremont's Hundred Days in Missouri" presented readers with a favorable defense of Fremont's actions between July 25, 1861, when the famed Pathfinder of the West personally assumed departmental command in St. Louis, and his relief from that lofty position on November 2, 1861. Over the many decades that have passed since the wartime publication of Dorsheimer's influential account, important bits and pieces of Fremont's reign in Missouri have been reexamined within the pages of numerous popular and scholarly articles and book chapters. However, no full-length study, least of all an exhaustive treatment, has yet attempted to fully describe and contextualize all of its military, political, and legal aspects inside a single volume. Touching upon all of those topics, yet directing the lion's share of its attention toward military matters, is Gregory Wolk's new book John Frémont’s 100 Days: Clashes and Convictions in Civil War Missouri.

Of course, the most controversial as well as most widely discussed aspect of Fremont's Hundred Days is the emancipation feature of the general's August 30, 1861 martial law proclamation, which ignited a political firestorm pitting radical supporters of the measure against its more moderate and conservative detractors. Recognizing that broad-scale emancipation was politically premature and bound to antagonize a large segment of the pro-Union base in the Border States and elsewhere, Lincoln, who also believed that such expansive executive powers were reserved for him alone, was unable to persuade Fremont to rescind the order. Instead, Fremont's recalcitrance forced the President to publicly do it himself. At that point, Fremont's days in Missouri were numbered. The most recent, and arguably one of the very best, treatments of the political aspects of Fremont's Missouri tenure is John Bicknell's The Pathfinder and the President: John C. Frémont, Abraham Lincoln, and the Battle for Emancipation (2025). Although Wolk dutifully devotes space and attention to this important and far-reaching topic, it is not his study's main point of emphasis.

Every Civil War departmental command was heavily politicized, but the one in 1861 Missouri was clearly among the most highly charged. Wolk's narrative follows many of the personalities involved both at the forefront and behind the scenes, among them members of the powerful Blair family and Fremont's deeply supportive wife, Jessie. Along with other noteworthy figures, some interesting individuals from Fremont's staff, including the aforementioned Dorsheimer, are brought into the discussion. The contentious role of General Justus McKinstry, as both departmental quartermaster and later division commander, is revisited. Judging from what Wolk, Bicknell, and others before them have uncovered, a truly accurate and fair appraisal of the allegations of graft and fraud within Fremont's department, a major part of which centered on McKinstry, seems nearly impossible at this late date given how much political interference was present and how slanted the investigation was conducted at the time.

As mentioned above, the main focal point and strength of Wolk's narrative is its coverage of military affairs. By the time Fremont arrived in St. Louis, hyper-aggressive Brigadier General Nathaniel Lyon had already split enemy resistance in the state along the line of the Missouri River, and his and other forces had hounded the largely pro-Confederate Missouri State Guard into the southwest and southeast corners of the state. Wolk recounts Fremont's oversight from afar of Lyon's continued operation that culminated in his battlefield defeat and death at Wilson's Creek as well as other ensuing action in the western part of the state, namely the failed attempt to effectively thwart Missouri State Guard commander Sterling Price's Lexington campaign. Closer to his St. Louis headquarters, Fremont oversaw operations in the Missouri Bootheel between his own forces (which include those of U.S. Grant) and the Missouri State Guard division of M. Jeff Thompson. Covered events there include the October 21 Battle of Fredericktown and the earlier Blackwell Raid. The largest scale operation (involving a Union army totaling upwards of 38,000 men) was led by Fremont in person and is still largely neglected in the literature. Over the last two weeks of October, Fremont marched at the head of his army, which never managed to fully concentrate, from Tipton to Springfield. Price's withdrawing forces, which rapidly diminished in number after Lexington, were never brought to battle, and Wolk persuasively rates the campaign's culminating moment, the famed "Zagonyi's Charge" at Springfield, as more of a wasteful public relations stunt intended to save Fremont's failing reputation than it was militarily sound action. A week later, Fremont was relieved, and he was formally replaced by General David Hunter on November 4.

Fremont's Civil War career has always sparked strong opinions, mostly negative, and one cannot classify Wolk's treatment of Fremont's performance during the Hundred Days as broadly revisionist. It is sympathetic in places, though, and one wishes Wolk had reserved a section at the end of the book for a summary of Fremont's accomplishments and failures. It would also have been interesting to read about what the author deems to have been Fremont's most prominent strengths (if any) and weaknesses as field and department commander. Like most of the recent literature, this study does not characterize the lead-up to the Battle of Wilson's Creek as Fremont hanging Lyon and his gallant little army out to dry. Wolk also counters criticisms of Fremont's actions during Price's Lexington operation by stating that the general did all he could to help Colonel James Mulligan's besieged defenders, but he doesn't elaborate on what those actions were or why those critics who claim that Fremont could and should have done much more to prevent the surrender are mistaken. Like Bicknell, Wolk does credit Fremont for being the first high-ranking officer to utilize U.S. Grant to effective purposes. While Fremont may not have had any great personal regard for Grant or envisioned any special abilities in the Illinois general that others overlooked at the time, both authors argue that he certainly did play a major part in fostering the launching and early development of Grant's Civil War military career.

While Gregory Wolk's John Frémont’s 100 Days may not be the type of comprehensive, exhaustively detailed account desired by some readers, it is well worthy of recommendation as a solid overview of the period. Until such a day arrives when we do get that definitive-level study, a pairing of Wolk's military coverage with John Bicknell's political discussion can provide readers of all stripes with a suitable background in John C. Fremont's brief but eventful 1861 reign in Missouri.

Booknotes: Thoughts That Burned

New Arrival:

• Thoughts That Burned: William Goodell, Human Rights, and the Abolition of American Slavery by Steve Gowler (Cornell UP, 2025).

Steve Gowler's Thoughts That Burned: William Goodell, Human Rights, and the Abolition of American Slavery details the life, impact, and legacy of "one of the most significant leaders of the antebellum antislavery movement. Between 1826 and 1864, Goodell edited more than a dozen reform newspapers and played a leading role in the formation of several organizations, including the American Anti-slavery Society, the Liberty Party, the American Missionary Association, and the Radical Abolition Party. His 1852 book Slavery and Anti-slavery was the first comprehensive history of the antislavery movement written by an American."

Goodell's crusading approach went far beyond contemporary attempts at moral suasion. More from the description: "Convinced that the logic of slavery needed to be investigated and laid bare, Goodell explored the institution's deep structures. Whereas many abolitionists based their arguments on the inhumane consequences of enslavement, Goodell analyzed the legal and psychological relations constituting the slave system. At the heart of this analysis was his close reading of Southern slave codes and of the United States Constitution. He argued that the Constitution, properly understood, is incompatible with slavery and should be used as an instrument of emancipation."

Among those strongly influenced by Goodell's interpretation of the Constitution "was Frederick Douglass, who described Goodell as the man "to whom the cause of liberty in America is as much indebted as to any other one American citizen."

Booknotes: Decisions at Chancellorsville

New Arrival:

• Decisions at Chancellorsville: The Sixteen Critical Decisions That Defined the Battle by Sarah Kay Bierle (U Tenn Press, 2025).

Given how much the Command Decisions in America’s Civil War series is talked about, and its many titles reviewed, on this site, regular readers won't need an introduction. For new visitors: Decisions at Chancellorsville "explores the critical decisions made by Confederate and Federal commanders during the campaign and how these decisions shaped its outcome. Rather than offering a history of the operation, Sarah Bierle hones in on a sequence of decisions made by commanders on both sides of the contest to provide a blueprint of the campaign at its tactical core. Identifying and exploring the critical decisions in this way allows students of the battles to progress from a knowledge of what happened to a mature grasp of why events happened."

The time period addressed in the volume is January 1863 to May 6, 1863, and the sixteen critical decisions under consideration are organized into six chapters. There are 17 maps, a 12-stop driving tour, an appendix exploring Chancellorsville Campaign memory (that might be a series first), and orders of battle for both sides.

Booknotes: Torn Asunder

New Arrival:

• Torn Asunder: Republican Crises and Civil Wars in the United States and Mexico, 1848–1867 by Erika Pani (UNC Press, 2025).

From the description: "In 1848, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the Mexican-American War and dramatically reshaped North American geopolitics by ceding half of Mexico’s territory to the United States. In the following decades, as conflicts over slavery in the United States and over the nature of nation, state, and religion in Mexico overwhelmed politics, both republics collapsed into civil war."

The politics, societies, and historical tracks of both nations are so different that identifying and exploring a series of unifying elements, even for a very specific period of history, seems like a tall task, but that is just what Erika Pani undertakes in her study Torn Asunder: Republican Crises and Civil Wars in the United States and Mexico, 1848–1867.

More from the description: Pani’s narrative "weaves these two tales of crisis, war, and political experimentation into a single story. Pani argues that by consecrating these episodes as epic and exceptionalist chapters in both nations' histories, scholars have overlooked the coincidences and connections between the United States and Mexico. She chronicles the ways in which, between 1848 and 1867, politicians from the two nations tested different formulas, reacted to virulent opposition, sedition, and war, and ultimately attempted to unite deeply divided countries."

In the end, Torn Asunder "highlights the fragile, contentious, and unpredictable nature of politics in the Americas, rooted in the inherent instability of popular sovereignty."

Booknotes: Opening Manassas

New Arrival:

• Opening Manassas: The Iron Brigade, Stonewall Jackson, and the Battle on Brawner’s Farm, August 28, 1862 by Lance J. Herdegen and Bill Backus (Savas Beatie, 2025).

From the description: In August of 1862, Confederate offensive movements that resulted in Union defeat at Cedar Mountain and the destruction of the massive Union supply base at Manassas Junction finally prompted a strong response from John Pope's Army of Virginia. "Pope withdrew from his defensive line along the Rappahannock determined to find and eradicate the Confederates. First he had to find them. Unbeknownst to Pope, Jackson had deployed his men in a strong wooded defensive position along an abandoned railroad cut. All Old Jack needed was a reason to sally forth and strike an unsuspecting piece of Pope’s scattered army. That opportunity presented itself on the afternoon of August 28 when the Western men, soon to be known as the Iron Brigade, marched along the Warrenton Pike, unaware that danger lurked just yards away off their exposed left flank."

The resulting clash at Brawner's Farm, a very bloody affair considering the numbers involved, was a brutal slugging match. While the tactical performance of the Confederates was pretty uninspiring, the clash cemented the reputation of their Iron Brigade opponents. Brawner's Farm also contributed profoundly to Pope's serial misperception of the military situation on his front. The newest in-depth investigation of this fight, Lance Herdegen and Bill Backus's Opening Manassas: The Iron Brigade, Stonewall Jackson, and the Battle on Brawner’s Farm, August 28, 1862, is "the first full-length balanced study of the affair ever published."

Of course, a great many Civil War studies are the result of research and writing collaboration between more than one author, but this study adopts a highly unconventional framework of co-authoring. More from the description: Opening Manassas "uses a fog-of-war approach to unfold the battle as the soldiers of both sides would have experienced it, and how the various officers reacted with only the information they had at the time. Award-winning author Lance J. Herdegen handles the Union side of the equation, while preservation historian and veteran of the National Park Service, Bill Backus, chronicles the Confederate perspective. Together, chapter by chapter, they march their respective forces to the point of destiny and discover unexpected insights into the engagement and the leadership decisions of both sides." Sounds interesting.

Snapshots from the Collection: "The Siege of Suffolk: The Forgotten Campaign April 11-May 4, 1863"

Steven A. Cormier's The Siege of Suffolk: The Forgotten Campaign April 11-May 4, 1863 was first published in 1989 by H.E. Howard in a numbered edition that was part of The Virginia Civil War Battles and Leaders series. I missed the boat on that one, but I was able to secure a Second Edition some time ago. It sat on my bookshelf for many years, always passed over by new releases. However, during this most recent lull, I was determined to finally get around to reading it, and I'm very glad I did as it is one of the very best volumes in a series widely known for being uneven in depth and quality.

Though it had a major impact on the 1863 Chancellorsville Campaign, Lieutenant General James Longstreet's Southside Virginia operation directed toward Major General John Peck's substantial Union garrison of Suffolk has received no detailed treatment outside Cormier's decades-old study. That isn't terribly surprising, given that casualties were low on both sides and there was no culminating battle to spark wider interest in the campaign.

Cormier outlines the four "missions" behind sending Longstreet and a large detachment from his corps (two divisions) south of the James River and into the Union-occupied eastern counties. The protection of Richmond was easily enough secured by their mere presence in the area and seizing enemy garrisons in the region (including the one at Suffolk) was a non-essential, although hoped for, goal given the problems (and probable heavy losses) involved in attempting to storm heavily fortified positions backed by naval support. As the author astutely observes, the dilemma came when two of the missions were incompatible with each other. Longstreet was enjoined by his army commander, General Robert E. Lee, to keep his divisions close to the Richmond-Petersburg railheads in case Union general Joseph Hooker's massive Army of the Potomac unexpectedly stirred. At the same time, Confederate War Secretary James Seddon ordered Longstreet to press deep into the coastal counties to gather supplies and relieve the Army of Northern Virginia's subsistence concerns, which were pressing due to the previous year's poor harvest. Longstreet could not fulfill both missions at the same, and it nearly resulted in disaster as Hooker struck while Longstreet, still engaged in securing food and fodder in the eastern counties, could not reach Lee's army in time for Chancellorsville.

Backed by a diverse collection of source materials (including manuscript research), Cormier explores the campaign's strategic origins and meticulously traces its conduct at both operational and micro-tactical levels. Though, as mentioned above, no major battles occurred, there were regular artillery duels, sharp fighting along the skirmish line, and guerrilla warfare to contend with as the Confederates sought to bottle up the Union garrison, freeing the countryside for extensive food and fodder collection. Longstreet also explored opportunities to seize the town, all of which Peck and his naval support effectively thwarted. Incorporating extensive quotes from reports, letters, and diaries, the text also conveys a rich portrait of the personal experiences of rank and file soldiers and civilians alike in their own words.

Cormier praises Peck's successful efforts in fortifying and defending Suffolk, which were rewarded by consistent support from above (including heavy reinforcement). Higher level dysfunction in army-navy cooperation is duly criticized, but the officers closest to the scene were able to produce some notable achievements. The Union naval war on the Nansemond River during this period, which consisted of numerous ship versus shore engagements and amphibious landings, is explored at great depth and is one of the volume's most original and noteworthy aspects. The author seems of two minds when it comes to assessing Longstreet's aggressiveness, on the one hand being critical of his failure to force a crossing of the upper Nansemond and on the other clearly recognizing the risks involved in forcing the issue by leaping into the Union rear. It is clear that Longstreet, closely engaged as he was before Suffolk, could never have reached Lee's army in time for the Chancellorsville battle without much more prior notice than was given. Accusations of tardiness during the withdrawal are effectively refuted by noting the necessity of covering the command's heavily laden subsistence trains. In attempting to gauge just how much food and fodder the Confederates were able to extract from the region during the operation, the late-war destruction of Subsistence Department records is lamented. However, estimates from other sources reveal a haul that did much to meet the needs of Lee's army as it prepared for its next campaign.

The only large complaint I have with the book is the state of its cartography, which is frankly dreadful. There are just a few bare-bones, hand-drawn area maps included, none of which show the movements and positions of either side, the Suffolk defenses, or the upper Nansemond front that yielded so much action. It is a testament to Cormier's organization and writing skills that the narrative is still comprehensible and highly readable. This map coverage deficiency, which definitely holds the book back from greatness, makes the volume a strong candidate for a fresh update from Savas Beatie, who has published a number of revised and expanded editions of H.E. Howard series titles with new and improved maps. I have my doubts that they would be interested, given the aforementioned issues that make the operation so obscure to begin with, but we can still hope!

Booknotes: Honey Springs, Oklahoma

New Arrival:

• Honey Springs, Oklahoma: Historical Archaeology of a Civil War Battlefield by William B. Lees (TAMU Pr, 2025)

The field of conflict archaeology has proven itself highly useful in both affirming and challenging the findings of more traditional document-based history. More than an adjunct, it can also raise important questions of its own. Though the interval between book-length publications has widened, it is good to see that the genre hasn't been completely overtaken by evolving trends.

William Lees's Honey Springs, Oklahoma: Historical Archaeology of a Civil War Battlefield takes us across the Mississippi and into what is today's Oklahoma to offer a fresh perspective on a major battle fought in the region. "Historians have long recognized the Battle of Honey Springs on July 17, 1863, for its unusual makeup of Black, Indian, and White combatants and as the most significant battle of the Civil War in Indian Territory."

More from the description: Lees's study "is the first book to focus solely on this event. It is unique in that its discourse and conclusions flow from the convergence of three lines of evidence: written history (memory), scientific archaeological findings, and military terrain analysis of the landscape." Like most books of this type, Lees's volume is filled with methodological description and analysis along with numerous artifact photos and distribution maps.

More: "One of the synthesizing questions addressed by author William B. Lees is how to explain rebel loss." Honey Springs, Oklahoma "makes clear the location of skirmishing, the lopsided attack of Union troops on the right of the Confederate line, and precise locations of fighting during the rebel retreat. This analysis is the fulcrum in the re-envisioning of the agency of Native American participants."

Booknotes: Haunted by the Civil War

New Arrival:

• Haunted by the Civil War: Cultural Testimony in the Nineteenth-Century United States by Shirley Samuels (Princeton UP, 2025).

Shirley Samuels's Haunted by the Civil War "explores the work of Walt Whitman, Emily Dickinson, Herman Melville, Frederick Douglass, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, and others to investigate the long cultural shadow of America’s cataclysmic sundering. Juxtaposing these texts with images—ranging from paintings by Winslow Homer to newspaper and magazine illustrations of political controversies—Samuels argues that the Civil War still haunts our attitudes toward democracy."

More from the description: "Examining the fraught deliberations about an ideal American democracy in the early republic, Samuels turns to the language of sensation in the poetry of Melville, Dickinson, and Whitman alongside Lincoln’s relation to the poetic and visual culture of his time. She considers the haunted afterlives of war in the work of Louisa May Alcott and Harriet Beecher Stowe as well as in popular nineteenth-century inspirational fiction. And she investigates the literature of men at sea (and on rivers, enabling both connection and escape), as seen in Melville and Mark Twain, while examining women’s wartime work and experience, in writings by Gilman and Frances Harper." As one can see, Samuels's investigation of the Civil War period's impact on American literature, culture, and politics incorporates a diverse array of writers, writings, and themes.