New Arrival:
• James Longstreet and the American Civil War: The Confederate General Who Fought the Next War by Harold M. Knudsen (Savas Beatie).
I am no Krick the Elder when it comes to James Longstreet. In my mind, he was an essential component of arguably the Civil War's highest-grossing band [frontman Lee, Jackson on lead guitar, Longstreet on bass, and Stuart on drums]. What I've never found particularly persuasive are the arguments put forth from time to time that Longstreet, through foresight and experienced reflection, developed strategic and tactical thinking so far ahead of most of his contemporaries that he could be considered exceptionally "modern" in his outlook.
Attempting to make that very case are two 2022 titles released within weeks of each other: F. Gregory Toretta's Lieutenant General James Longstreet: Innovative Military Strategist - The Most Misunderstood Civil War General and Harold Knudsen's James Longstreet and the American Civil War: The Confederate General Who Fought the Next War. If Knudsen's effort sounds familiar, you would be right. This new book is a "significantly expanded and completely revised" version of (if Google Books serves me correctly) a 2007 volume published under the title General James Longstreet: The Confederacy's Most Modern General.
According to Knudsen, Longstreet "made overlooked but profound modern contributions to the art of war." These were "significant and executed on a large scale," and the book "explains what Longstreet did and how he did it."
From the description: "Longstreet understood early that the tactical defense was generally dominant over the offense, which was something few grasped in 1862. Longstreet’s thinking demonstrated a clear evolution that began on the field at First Manassas in July 1861, developed through the bloody fighting of 1862, and culminated in the brilliant defensive victory at Fredericksburg that December. The lethality with which his riflemen and artillery mowed down repeated Union assaults hinted at what was to come in World War I. Longstreet’s ability to launch and control powerful offensives was on display at Second Manassas in August 1862. His assault plan at Chickamauga in Georgia the following September was similar, if not the forerunner to, World War II tactical-level German armored tactics. Other areas show progressive applications with artillery, staff work, force projection, and operational-level thinking." In developing this analysis, the author "draws heavily upon 20th century U.S. Army doctrine, field training, staff planning, command, and combat experience" and concludes that Longstreet was "a modern thinker unparalleled in the Confederate Army."
I don't have a copy of Toretta's book to make any superficial comparisons beyond what's suggested in the table of contents. Knudsen addresses Longstreet's entire Civil War career, but examines most closely his role as subordinate corps commander from Second Manassas through Chattanooga. Toretta's book begins at Chancellorsville (where Longstreet wasn't present but perhaps tactically influential in regards to entrenched lines) and ends with the Wilderness, where the general was badly wounded. Perhaps someone will publish a dual review in coming months.
Being a bass player in a successful hard rock band, and a Longstreet fan, and the acquisition editor, and the publisher, I was pleased to see this post as well as your promotion of Old Pete from corps commander to bassist. Now give that Georgian a Rickenbacker.
ReplyDeleteIt's a good book. I hope you enjoy it.
Do either of these books say much about his two independent command stints(Suffolk and Knoxville)? By the way the Suffolk Campaign could do with a modern treatment other than the H.E. Howard treatment.
ReplyDeleteVery, very brief coverage in Knudsen. Don't know about the other one.
DeleteI have that Suffolk Campaign book but never got around to reading it. It used to be horrendously expensive on the secondary market (and maybe it still is) but I lucked out on eBay way back when.
Knudsen focused on battlefield experiences that demonstrated major forward-looking lessons.
DeleteThe Howard series Suffolk study is one of the best in the highly uneven series. I had a chance to reprint, but nothing is digital and a facsimile reprint of a horrendously designed/formatted book isn't my cup of tea.
I definitely agree that we need something on Suffolk. For me, however, in line before that would be something on Seven Pines. The best out there is still Steven Newton's HE Howard book done 30 years ago in the usual truncated Howard format. Tellingly, the second best study is the same author's subsequent larger scale book on Johnston's defense of Richmond in Spring 1862.
ReplyDeleteSeven Pines desperately needs more attention. I heard some time ago that there are still two volumes of Russell H. Beatie's AoP study that have yet to me published. If true that would mean Seven Pines would be covered as least from the Union perspective.
DeleteJohn, what's your opinion on Cormier's book? I've owned it for years and never even looked at it.
DeleteCormier's study is one of the best of the entire series.
DeleteYes, Cap Beatie's 1,400-page manuscript covers Seven Pines (and we will be working on it soon). We also have another Seven Pines (a narrower slice) study vetted I believe by Krick the Younger. Late 2023.
Drew: I concur with Ted. It's much more detailed and lengthy than most of the books in that series. It's more than 30 years out, so I think a modern study is due - especially since it's only available now at those usual OOP used book prices.
ReplyDelete