Paid Sponsor
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query tales of the war. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query tales of the war. Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, December 17, 2012

Banasik, ed.: "CONFEDERATE "TALES OF THE WAR" IN THE TRANS-MISSISSIPPI, Part Three: 1863"

[Confederate "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi, Part Three: 1863 edited by Michael Banasik (Camp Pope Publishing, 2012). Softcover, illustrations, maps, notes, appendices, bibliography, index. 244 pp. ISBN: 978-1-929919-45-1 $17.95]

Tales of the War, Part 3
click on image for link
For those unfamiliar with it, Confederate "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi, Part Three is the latest release from a sub-series of titles together comprising Volume VII of Camp Pope's Unwritten Chapters of the Civil War West of the River series. "Tales of the War" were 94 St. Louis Missouri Republican newspaper articles written by participants of both sides, appearing in the paper over a two year period. Writings cover both the Trans-Mississippi and western theaters, and editor Michael Banasik has assembled the T-M related pieces in yearly volumes [Confederate articles are compiled for Parts 1 (1861), 2 (1862), and 3 (1863), with 4 combining the last two years of the war. From there, the Union volumes will appear].

Part Three: 1863 actually starts out in late 1862 with the December Raid on Van Buren, Arkansas. Several pieces cover the retreat to Little Rock and garrison life in the capital, as well as the Battle of Arkansas Post in January. Summer operations by Walker's Texas Division against Grant's lines of communication in NE Louisiana, with skirmishes at places like Delphi and Richmond, are also touched upon. Several articles reminisce about the Battle of Helena (July 4), the Little Rock Campaign, and the Marmaduke-Walker duel that resulted in the death of the latter. The tales end with the Battle of Pine Bluff (October 25). Of added value is the consideration that most of these events are only lightly covered in the secondary literature.

As with any collection, the writings vary in length, detail, and accuracy. Some individuals (e.g. Henry Luttrell, Silas Turnbo, James Grubbs, and James McNamara) were multiple contributors, with Turnbo (the oft cited chronicler of the 27th Arkansas) among those featuring particularly useful content. The passages are extensively footnoted from a variety of sources. Especially for the "tales" describing skirmishes and battles, these notes often comprise something of a parallel narrative, cobbled together from the best available material. Differences in interpretation and factual errors in the original texts are duly noted. The sheer amount of information contained in the notes is immense. In contrast to the famous Battles and Leaders collection, "Tales of the War" contributors were typically of much lower military rank, with a corresponding difference in perspective.

Similar to previous volumes in the series, the appendices in Part Three comprise a delightful range of biographical information, official correspondence, numbers data, and ephemera. In this section, there's a fine organizational and command history of the infantry, artillery, and mounted units that made up Parsons's Missouri brigade. The unit composition of Walker's Texas Division is listed, but much more detailed (in terms of numerical effectives, casualties, etc.) are orders of battle for Confederate forces that fought at Helena and Pine Bluff. In addition to far surpassing the typical Civil War OB in terms of information provided, sources and methodology are also documented. The only complaints I have with the volume are the frequency of typos and the wish for a more robust index.

Confederate "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi, Part Three is yet another important contribution to the Civil War scholarship of this theater. Whichever role one occupies -- scholar, researcher, dedicated enthusiast, or even casual reader -- there is a great deal of substantive material of all kinds available in the book. At the conclusion of each and every volume of this wonderful series, one's thoughts immediate turn in anticipation toward the next.


Also See:
Confederate "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi, Part One: 1861
Confederate "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi, Part Two: 1862


Monday, October 10, 2011

Banasik (ed.): "CONFEDERATE 'TALES OF THE WAR' IN THE TRANS-MISSISSIPPI PART TWO 1862"

Confederate Tales of the War Part  2

[Confederate "Tales of the War" Part 2 edited by Michael E. Banasik (Camp Pope Publishing). Softcover, 5 maps, illustrations, notes, appendices, bibliography, index. 244 Pp. ISBN:978-1-929919-36-9 $17.95]

Between 1885 and 1887, the St. Louis newspaper Missouri Republican published a series of 94 wartime reminiscences, both Union and Confederate. Michael Banasik has collected these pieces for a sub-series of books comprising Volume VII of Camp Pope Publishing's Unwritten Chapters of the Civil War West of the River series. Part 1, released in 2010, dealt with Missouri's war in 1861. This new volume, Confederate "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi, Part 2 covers 1862, focusing on participant accounts of the battles of Pea Ridge, Lone Jack, and Prairie Grove (with others covering events such as the Horse Creek fight in Missouri and the Palmyra Massacre). Future volumes will cover the 1863-65 period, as well as contributions to the newspaper series from Union soldiers.

The reminiscences collected by Banasik vary greatly in length and detail.  One of the best pieces contained in Part 2 is artilleryman Hunt P. Wilson's Pea Ridge narrative. He provides useful information about the positions and movements of the guns on the Confederate army's left flank during both days.  The most entertaining piece, delightful in its sarcastic charm, is Dewitt C. Hunter's point by point refutation of Sidney D. Jackman's account of the Battle of Lone Jack. Marveling at how many times Jackman used the pronoun "I" in his narrative, Hunter thereafter refers to Jackman only as "I Did."  Jackman's self-serving critique was also not appreciated by other participants, with Henry Luttrell, Col. John C. Tracy, and Granville C. Bowen directing a similar amount of dismay toward the apparent untruths of many of Jackman's assertions.

In his role as editor, Michael Banasik puts all of the Missouri Republican contributions under the microscope. In addition to providing source information and further insights into the background of persons, places, and events mentioned in the text, his notes examine the merits of participant claims based on the available body of evidence.  The research material amassed by Bansik for this process is satisfyingly deep, composed of a well balanced mix of manuscripts, government documents, books, articles, pamphlets, and newspapers.

Given how poorly regarded General Sterling Price is by modern scholars, it is noteworthy that essentially no serious criticism of the famous Missourian is entertained by the sometimes contentious "Tales of the War" writers. Perhaps like R.E. Lee, the popular "Old Pap" was a bit of a hands off figure among ex-Confederates in the late 19th century period.  On the other hand, Price's military reputation suffered greatest during the second half of the war, the subject of future volumes.

One of the greatest assets of Part 2 is Banasik's extensively documented Confederate order of battle for Pea Ridge. Unlike previous efforts, this one makes a solid attempt to provide accurate numbers of effectives for each unit. Banasik also seeks to correct the record on the numbers and types of guns attached to each battery.  The footnotes offer source information and methodological data. They also note where the editor's research and conclusions frequently conflict with those of William Shea and Earl Hess, whose OB from their definitive study Pea Ridge: Civil War Campaign in the West is widely regarded as the best to date. Other appendices offer mini-biographies of figures mentioned in the text (a staple of the series), a small collection of correspondence and orders from 1862, a list of executions from Kirksville and Palmyra, and an index of Confederate "Tales of the War" pieces focused beyond the Trans-Mississippi theater (and thus not used). Finally, Sidney Jackman's 1885 Missouri Republican Lone Jack battle account (referenced above) is reproduced in its entirety as an appendix.

Michael Banasik's collection and editing of Confederate newspaper reminiscences, as well as his thoughtful selection of enormously useful supplemental material, in Confederate "Tales of the War" Part 2 comprise yet another important contribution to the historiography of the Civil War in the Trans-Mississippi theater. One greatly looks forward to future volumes from this highly recommended series.

Tuesday, November 5, 2019

Review - "Confederate "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi, Part Five: 1864-1865" by Banasik & Banasik, eds.

[Confederate "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi, Part Five: 1864-1865 edited by Michael E. Banasik & Brenda F. Banasik (Camp Pope Publishing, 2019). Paperback, 11 maps, photos, notes, appendices, bibliography, index. 528 pp. ISBN:978-1-929919-89-5. $29.95]

Confederate "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi, Part Five: 1864-1865 is the latest addition to Camp Pope Publishing's profoundly useful and important Unwritten Chapters of the Civil War West of the River series. Part Five of Volume VII also marks the conclusion of Michael and Brenda Banasik's editing of the Confederate collection of "Tales of the War" reminiscences first published in the St. Louis Missouri Republican between 1885 and 1887. It is no promotional exaggeration to say that the still-growing Unwritten Chapters series "probably constitutes the greatest single collection of primary material ever assembled on the Trans-Mississippi to date."

The first chapter of Part Five deals with the aftermath of the 1864 Camden Expedition in Arkansas, which ended with Union defeat and retreat but was costly in Confederate casualties during its final stage. Other articles in the section deal with late-war fighting along the Mississippi and White rivers. Most prominent of the events discussed by the "Tales of the War" writers are the Battle of Ditch Bayou and Jo Shelby's celebrated capture of the gunboat U.S.S. Queen City.

The next chapter continues to explore events related to the war's finishing strokes in the Trans-Mississippi, but its unique highlight is the trio of accounts dealing with the August 1865 murders in Mexico of Missouri Confederate general Mosby Monroe Parsons and his traveling companions. Their deaths remain shrouded in mystery, and the three historical articles along with the deeply researched editorial commentary in the footnotes offer readers multiple views and perspectives that together remind us that we will likely never know the complete truth about the bloody affair and its perpetrators.

While the 1864 Red River Campaign was a major focus of Part Four, Sterling Price's 1864 Missouri Expedition is the major military operation at the heart of Part Five. Based on his meticulous campaign diary, 10th Missouri cavalryman Henry Luttrell's third chapter article offers readers one of the most extensive eyewitness accounts available of the operation from beginning to end. A significant resource, Luttrell's memoir addresses aspects of nearly all major battles fought during the campaign, from Pilot Knob through Second Newtonia.

Last but not least, the book's fourth chapter deals with irregular operations, and its deep coverage of lesser-known actors associated with the guerrilla conflict greatly enhances its appeal and value to readers. While the figure of Sidney Drake Jackman is well recognized by most students of the war in Missouri (two articles, a biography of Jackman and Jackman's own account of his 1863 recruiting operations, are included), the other individuals featured in the chapter—Charles Harrison, James W. Cooper, and August Doley—are obscure or completely unknown to most. On a Confederate mission to Colorado, the purpose of which remains a subject of debate, Harrison and nearly his entire traveling party were killed by pro-Union Osages in Kansas. Cooper was a guerrilla who operated mostly in NW Arkansas, and his article describes his experiences over the second half of the war. Doley was a Confederate recruiter who was captured behind enemy lines and, like many of his compatriots (regularly commissioned or not) performing similar duty, executed.

A great deal of well-deserved skepticism is directed toward memoir-type materials, but "Tales" writers frequently employed research along with their own wartime documents to create articles with useful amounts of detail, specificity of dates, etc. Also, contributors to the series were mostly low-ranking officers and men without lofty public reputations to promote or protect (or prominent enemies to try to discredit).

As is the case with all volumes in the series, the book's many editorial features are invaluable supplements to the historical articles. Because article introductions and bridging narrative are not components of the book's format, those types of traditional editorial text are instead placed in the notes. It is often the case that the footnote section fills nearly the entire page with heavily-referenced historical context along with extensive descriptions of persons, places, and events mentioned in the associated article. The editors' wide-ranging research in primary and secondary sources includes a vast array of books, articles, government documents, newspapers, and manuscript materials of all kinds. The footnotes and appendix section alone are worth more than the book's purchase price.

Much of the volume's 200-page appendix section is focused on the 1864 Missouri Expedition. Inside are additional documents and editorial commentary; a collection of short biographies; an extensively annotated September 1864 Army of Missouri order of battle; orders of battle for Pilot Knob, Glasgow, and Westport; a reassessment of Confederate casualties at Mine Creek; and a quantitative summary of the results of the Missouri Expedition (more specifically, data and numbers regarding federal prisoners captured, arms and artillery lost and captured, Confederate prisoners lost, Confederate recruits gained, value and type of property destroyed or captured, and damage levels to the state's railroad network). Numbers and losses of all kinds are heavily documented and analysis of them results in many conclusions that challenge established interpretations. As just one example, the editors arrived at a range of initial effective troop numbers in Price's army that are as much as 50% higher than the traditionally accepted range of 10-12,000. Their manpower analysis, combined with their recruitment versus loss estimates over the course of the campaign, generally supports Walter Busch's revisionist determination (the product of a decade of records research by Fort Davidson park staff) that Price had over 20,000 fighting men at Westport.

The publication of Confederate "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi, Part Five marks the completion of just one major phase of the massive effort on the part of Michael and Brenda Banasik to bring the St. Louis Missouri Republican articles the wider attention that they deserve. The editorial pair are now on to Union "Tales of the War," and in the coming years those will be just as highly anticipated.

Friday, June 28, 2024

Review - "Union "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi - Part One: 1861" ed. by Michael Banasik

[Union "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi - Part One: 1861 edited by Michael E. Banasik (Camp Pope Publishing, 2024). Softcover, 4 maps, photos, footnotes, appendix section, bibliography, index. Pages:xii,276. ISBN:978-1-929919-95-6. $17.95]

If this is your first exposure to Camp Pope Publishing's "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi series, which is itself a sub-series of the press's Unwritten Chapters of the Civil War West of the River series, its constituent volumes are edited compilations of newspaper articles written by Civil War veterans of all ranks. Those reminiscences were printed by The Missouri Republican (St. Louis) in the paper's Saturday editions between 1885 and 1887. Comprising the writings of ex-Confederates, "Tales of the War" Volume VII was published in five parts [follow this link to read site reviews of those titles] and is still in print. This new release, Union "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi - Part One: 1861, marks the beginning of Volume VIII, which follows the previous format but from the Union perspective. All installments of the Unwritten Chapters series are chiefly, and most often solely, edited by Michael Banasik.

Given where the center of the action was in 1861, it is not too surprising that Part One is predominantly a Missouri affair. The book's opening chapter collects a series of reminiscences of Missouri political and military episodes from the first six months of the year. Prominent events from the period that are recalled include the struggle over the St. Louis arsenal, the ascendancy of General Nathaniel Lyon, the "Camp Jackson Affair" (and its aftermath), Union recruiting in the state, and some early small-scale operations. The next chapter is comprised of six articles covering various aspects of the battles of Carthage and Wilson's Creek, and Banasik himself contributes an informative piece about the Union army's retreat to Rolla. The third and final chapter contains two articles, one revisits the use of hemp bales as mobile breastworks at Lexington (the most widely known incident of the siege) and the other the fight at Belmont.

The material is heavily annotated, with expansive explanatory footnotes nearly filling an entire page on occasion. Based on manuscript materials, newspaper articles, government records, books, and articles, the notes fulfill the traditional role of providing background and context for persons, places, and events mentioned in the main text. Capsule biographies of noteworthy individuals, both well-known and obscure, are also common footnote features. Banasik's notes frequently, and often at some length, weigh the merits of conflicting interpretations found in the secondary literature, and those discussions are additionally supplemented with his own research and conclusions. In terms of presentation, the only major complaint is with the rampant missing words and typographical errors found in both main text and footnotes, which are very uncharacteristic of both series and publisher.

With multiple pieces featured in the first two chapters, the most frequent contributor to the volume is Otto C. Lademann, a former Third Missouri captain. In this reviewer's opinion, his group of articles are the clear highlight of Part One. In addition to being highly observant firsthand accounts of the marching and battlefield experiences of German soldiers during the Missouri campaigns of 1861, Lademann's writings also frequently go against the grain without seeming agenda-driven. German troops are often stereotyped as ethnocentric "I fights mit Sigel" idolizers of that controversial general's presence and military ability, but Lademann's accounts of Carthage and Wilson's Creek are very evenhanded, and in places highly critical of Sigel's battlefield behavior and decision-making.

The wealth of additional editorial commentary and reference information found in the appendix section is a key feature of every "Tales of the War" title. This volume's Appendix A assembles a collection of relevant official communications in the form of letters, resolutions, proclamations, and political addresses. Expanded biographical treatments of a select group of military officers and political figures are included in the second appendix. The editor's "extended comments" on a variety of topics, mostly battle-related, comprise most of Appendix C. Meticulous order of battle, unit strength, and casualty reviews for both sides at Carthage, Wilson's Creek, and Belmont are compiled in the last appendix. Attached to the revised OB tables are extensive additional editorial commentary and secondary source engagement similar to those found in both main text and footnotes.

Those who appreciate (as anyone with an extensive interest in the Civil War west of the Mississippi should) the five-part Confederate "Tales of the War" writings of Volume VII will be very happy to know that they can expect more of the same in Part One's strong start to Union-focused Volume VIII.

Monday, April 13, 2015

Banasik & Banasik, eds.: "CONFEDERATE "TALES OF THE WAR" IN THE TRANS-MISSISSIPPI, Part Four: 1864. From Winter Camp to Pleasant Hill and Jenkins' Ferry"

[CONFEDERATE "TALES OF THE WAR" IN THE TRANS-MISSISSIPPI, Part Four: 1864. From Winter Camp to Pleasant Hill and Jenkins' Ferry. Edited by Michael Banasik and Brenda F. Banasik (Camp Pope Publishing, 2015). Paperback, illustrations, maps, notes, appendices, bibliography, index. 288 pp. $17.95]

Tales of the War, Part 4
Click on image to order
For those unfamiliar with Camp Pope Publishing's "Tales of the War" sub-series of its Unwritten Chapters of the Civil War West of the River Volume VII, content is drawn from participant reminiscences published on Saturdays in The Missouri Republican newspaper between 1885 and 1887. This is the fourth Confederate "Tales of the War" installment to be published (with one more on the way before moving on to the Union contributors). In Part Four, the writers recall 1864 events beginning with the 1863-64 winter encampments and ending with the conclusion of the Camden Expedition.

The winter remembrances aren't just limited to typical camp antics and mundane duties, they also document little known military operations directed toward logistical support for upcoming campaigns. 1864 Red River Campaign coverage centers around the battles of Pleasant Hill and Jenkins' Ferry. Mansfield, the battle that turned the tide of the campaign, is largely unaddressed but some material does touch  upon other important actions like Poison Spring and Marks' Mills in Arkansas. Writer stature ranges widely, from enlisted man to major general.

Memoir writing is often subordinated to journals, diaries, and letters in terms of preferred Civil War source material but sometimes distance and cooled passion can bring detached honesty of its own. More than one contributor freely admits that the Confederate right at Pleasant Hill was driven off the field in disorder. Regular readers will recognize writers from earlier Tales installments like Henry Luttrell of the 10th Missouri Cavalry and the 27th Arkansas's Silas Turnbo, but high ranking officers like General Thomas Churchill also offer their memories of campaign events. Editor Michael Banasik [beginning with Part Four, he's also brought in wife Brenda Banasik as co-editor] claims that no Red River Campaign author has used the original "Tales of the War" articles as source material in book or article so their publication here adds a freshness factor to already considerable intrinsic value.

As in previous volumes, the depth of the Banasik footnotes is incredible.  Created using a wide range of primary and secondary sources, the annotations are on their own immensely informative as both parallel narrative and in-depth investigator of persons, places, events, and claims mentioned in the text. Biographical material (often quite extensive) is offered for every individual named. Events are often fleshed out considerably, with heavily researched descriptions frequently running upwards of 200-300 words in length. In addition to confirming or correcting author claims and figures, the notes also often weigh the validity of competing interpretations from the major secondary works. While unfailingly interesting, some of these exercises are clearly open to further debate.  For example, while most observers consider Pleasant Hill to be a tactical defeat for the Confederates, Banasik cites similar casualty levels and the continued presence of part of Taylor's army on the battlefield as reason enough to rate the action a solid draw.

Extensive and richly informative appendices have always been highly regarded features of the Unwritten Chapters series volumes and those included in Part Four are very worthy of reader attention. Appendix A consists of a selection of letter and order documents.  Well researched short biographies of key Trans-Mississippi military figures mentioned in the text are a common feature of the series and the quality of those present in Appendix B is in keeping with precedent. Appendix C offers a serious reassessment of Confederate order of battle, numbers, and losses for the Battle of Pleasant Hill. Nearly every line of the OB is annotated, with a selection of published research supplemented by the editor's consultation of the O.R., newspaper resources, unit histories, letters, reports and more used to come up with numbers of effectives, casualties, and battery compositions. Conclusions frequently conflict with traditional ones. Additional Red River editorial commentary can be found in Appendix D, while E consists of Confederate orders of battle (similar in detail and scope to Appendix C's) for Poison Spring, Marks' Mills, and Jenkins' Ferry. Another notable feature of the OB research is its original attempt to describe and quantify the Red River Campaign roles of parolees and state militia, participant groups not mentioned much in existing narratives. Complaints with the book mainly pertain to presentation issues. Typos are frequently found in the notes and the cartography selections are weaker than those in earlier volumes.  Given how often the alignment of the Confederate right at Pleasant Hill was described in error by the contributors, a better detailed battle map would have been helpful.

The soldier remembrances collected in the many Unwritten Chapters of the Civil War West of the River volumes are unique and invaluable resources for Trans-Mississippi scholars and research enthusiasts. Part Four of Confederate "Tales of the War" is yet another highly recommended addition to the series, especially for students of the 1864 Red River Campaign and its associated Camden Expedition. With Confederate "Tales" ending with the next release, their Union counterparts will soon take the stage, a switch in perspective that is anticipated with great relish.


*** For more information and to order this title, go to Camp Pope Publishing ***

Monday, May 18, 2026

Booknotes: Haunted by Memory (with excerpt)

New Arrival:

Haunted by Memory: Ghost Stories of the American Civil War edited by John R. Neff and Amy Laurel Fluker (U Tenn Press, 2026).

Since this site's inception, a number of Civil War book series published by university presses have sadly either scaled back their offerings or disappeared entirely. On a happier note, though, others have broadened their horizons. One of those is the venerable Voices of the Civil War series from University of Tennessee Press, which has recently expanded beyond its traditional domain of edited letters, memoirs, and diaries into themed anthologies like this one. Roughly halfway to Halloween, we are treated to Haunted by Memory: Ghost Stories of the American Civil War, edited by John Neff and Amy Laurel Fluker.

Most Civil War readers possess at least a passing familiarity with the unique brand of supernatural and psychological horror writings of Ninth Indiana veteran and staff officer Ambrose Bierce, but apparently the postwar public's taste for such things was more widespread than many of us realize. From the description: "As America’s bloodiest conflict, it is no surprise that the Civil War gave rise to a golden age of ghost stories. Popular publications were filled with accounts of ghosts―ghosts that appeared in the heat of battle, in the fretful quiet of picket duty, and in the miserable confines of hospitals and prisons. Civil War ghosts continued to haunt the troubled peace that followed, revealing that even so deadly a conflict left unresolved issues in its wake."

The era's ghost stories were not just spooky entertainment for the reading masses. More from the description: "They provide powerful evidence of how a wounded country tried to put the trauma, grief, and anxieties inflicted by the Civil War to rest. By telling ghost stories, Americans created narratives that honored the dead, explained the unexplainable, and gave their experiences a broader sense of identity and purpose."

At over 400 pages, Neff and Fluker's Haunted by Memory addresses haunted tales in a great variety of formats. "(T)he first scholarly analysis of the significance of ghosts to the history and memory of the Civil War," this volume "includes hundreds of examples of ghostly tales that appeared in newspapers, periodicals, and books between 1861 and 1932. These tales both satisfied and fed popular demand for news, entertainment, and ghostlore, and became powerful tools of cultural memory." In addition to compiling the material, the editors establish historical and cultural context through a lengthy introduction and provide extensive chapter notes. Those annotations "provide important historical context, explanatory detail, and biographical information." Though the task proved not to be entirely possible, the goal was to "provide an annotation for all individuals named in the stories" (pg. xxi).

In sum: "(b)y bridging the study of the Civil War, folklore, and memory, this collection expands the parameters of cultural history and reveals how the supernatural became a lasting part of the commemorative landscape of the American Civil War."

The publisher has also kindly provided an excerpt for CWBA readers to consider (press the 'read more' button to view it in its entirety):

-----------------------------------------

Haunted by Memory: Ghost Stories of the American Civil War

excerpted commentary from Chapter 1: An Age of Spooks


John R. Neff and Amy Laurel Fluker


Understanding how ghost stories became a popular form of cultural expression in the Civil War era requires an understanding of the war’s nearly incomprehensible death toll. Still the deadliest war in US history, it claimed the lives of at least 800,000 combatants. Taken as an equivalent proportion of the US population in the early twenty-first century, that amounts to 8,000,000 lives. But, as historian J. David Hacker reminds us, even that number is a best-guess estimate. It does not account for civilian deaths, particularly among the enslaved, and only roughly accounts for African American soldier dead.i In short, the Civil War was far deadlier than historians will ever be able to fully appreciate.

...
Read more

The extent of grief in the postbellum era was so overwhelming that it exerted a palpable force. No one described this atmosphere more eloquently than novelist Elizabeth Stuart Phelps. She reflected:

At that time, it will be remembered, our country was dark with sorrowing women. . . . Toward the nameless mounds of Arlington, of Gettysburg, and the rest, the yearning of desolated homes went out in those waves of anguish which seem to choke the very air that the happier and more fortunate must breathe.


Is there not an actual, occult force in the existence of a general grief? . . . It is like a material miasma. The gayest man breathes it, if he breathe at all; and the most superficial cannot escape it.ii


No surprise, then, that the war’s survivors were haunted by it. As the Indiana Plymouth Tribune observed in 1907: “The war is still present, a vivid reality and yet a memory. And it is not strange that from its bloody happenings have grown some superstitions, some curious fireside tales that ill assort with our arrogant workaday disbelief in ghosts and the unusual.”iii

What is perhaps most interesting about the ghost stories collected in Haunted by Memory, however, is that they reveal that hauntings were not only a postwar phenomena. Veterans testified that ghosts were a part of the experience of Civil War soldiers in combat. Take, for example, the story of Private Henry Moode, who was confronted by the apparition of a Confederate soldier he recognized—having accidentally stumbled over his dead body just moments before. Or, the tale of the “mounted ghost” that terrorized Union pickets on duty near Blaine’s Crossroads. In the chaos of combat and confronted on all sides by the inescapable realities of death, Civil War soldiers manifested ghosts. Or, perhaps, ghosts manifested themselves.

The daily lives of Civil War soldiers, however, were not constantly characterized by terror and death. There were idle moments, too. At such times, soldiers called upon the supernatural as a form of entertainment. The men of the 116th Pennsylvania, for example, filled time during the siege of Petersburg by trading accounts of comrades who returned from the grave to visit their families.

Even when recounted as pastimes, ghost stories offer insights into nineteenth-century American culture. The ghosts of the 116th, like many others described in the stories included in Haunted by Memory, embodied an age-old theme in the Anglo-American tradition of supernatural tales: that of the purposeful ghost. The purposeful ghost appears not merely to frighten the living, but with the intention of achieving some end.

Oftentimes, the ghost returns because it is bound to an unfulfilled promise. Many Civil War soldiers felt the bonds of camaraderie they formed in combat might transcend death. Faced by the suddenness of death in battle and the likelihood they would be denied the opportunity to say final farewells, soldiers sometimes vowed to return from beyond the grave to visit their brothers-in-arms. They believed such visitations might bring closure to grieving friends and provide proof of “the state of the soul after death.” At least, that was the hope of two unnamed comrades from the 2nd Iowa Cavalry, who reportedly made such a promise to one another while on picket duty before the Battle of Farmington. The ghost of “Copleston” appeared to his friend in the prison barracks at Camp Chase to fulfill a similar promise and to relate the details surrounding his death.

In yet another tradition associated with the purposeful ghost, spirits sometimes returned seeking justice or vengeance. Two stories relate to wartime homicides, but the most notable is the story of Private John Rowley. Rowley swore before a US military tribunal that he was being tormented by the spirit of his comrade, Jerome Dupoy, whom he confessed to murdering. The haunting of Rowley serves as a reminder that not all violent deaths came at the hands of the enemy.

The stories also reveal how quickly Civil War sites became associated with hauntings. At locations where specific incidents of the war occurred, the past intruded on the present and stirred memories of the horrors of the war. Battlefields, in particular, emerge from the stories as unsettling places. Take, for example, the specters of Savage’s Station who cried for water from beyond the grave. Or, the ghostly regiments that stalked the cliffs at Pittsburg Landing.

The belief that battlefields were haunted undoubtedly stemmed from the knowledge that not only were they sites of deaths, but of bad deaths. The Civil War shattered the cultural construction of the “Good Death.” That is, a manner of death that followed a specific set of rituals designed to reinforce family bonds, provide assurances of Christian salvation, and offer closure to the grieving.iv The Civil War bestowed precious few “Good Deaths,” leaving survivors with little consolation. They had no formula to follow when it came to mourning the sudden, violent deaths of loved ones far from home. Their grief was compounded by fears that their loved one’s remains were unidentified, unattended—or worse—unburied.

The tale of the “Ghost at Post 1” powerfully illustrates not only the unsettling realities of death in the Civil War, but also the cultural significance of ghost stories. In this case, the ghost’s purpose is multi-faceted. In the text, the repeated appearance of a Confederate apparition led the men of the 6th Illinois Cavalry on an investigation that resulted in the recovery of his forgotten remains. After providing the unknown Confederate a decent burial, the ghost never returned.

Beyond the text, however, the “Ghost at Post 1” serves a larger symbolic purpose. It is important to note that this particular story appeared in the National Tribune. Founded in 1877, the National Tribune played a pivotal role in the construction of Civil War memory among Union veterans.v It actively encouraged veterans to submit their recollections of the war to its regular column “Fighting Them Over”—where the tale of the “Ghost at Post 1” appeared. Collectively, the column constituted a history of the war that was shaped by and meaningful for veterans.vi

The story of the “Ghost at Post 1” must therefore be understood in the context of Civil War memory. It reflects the popular turn towards reconciliation that dominated Civil War commemoration in the late nineteenth century. In this period, aging white veterans increasingly relished recollections of the war that emphasized the common bravery of volunteer soldiers on both sides and minimized the moral and political opposition over racial slavery that drove them into conflict.vii The “Ghost at Post 1” concludes with a particularly meaningful act of reconciliation. By respectfully tending to the remains of the unknown Confederate soldier, the men of the 6th Illinois Cavalry quite literally put the spirit of sectional antagonism to rest. Death, in this case at least, symbolically restored the common humanity of erstwhile foes.

There is one final and compelling thread that can be traced through the selection of stories in Haunted by Memory: that is the importance of women’s experiences to understanding the impact, prosecution, and subsequent interpretation of the Civil War. When, for example, Sarah Whiteside showed a Boston newspaper correspondent the spot where fifty soldiers had once been buried in her garden, she offered chilling testimony of how the war blurred the line between the battlefield and the home front and, in particular, how it violated the domestic world of women. Her story reminds readers that women’s experiences were not ancillary to the war, but rather central parts of the story.viii

The fortunes of armies in the field rose and fell with those of the “Nameless Heroines” of the war, as one unknown contributor to the Anaconda Standard termed them. Women both inspired and compelled men to enlist. At the same time, painful and worrisome separations from female friends, relatives, and loved ones drove some men to desertion. The anonymous soldier in “The Corporal’s Story” claimed to have been so distressed by news that his wife was seriously ill that he put a plan to desert into action. Before he was missed, however, a female apparition frightened and shamed him into returning to camp.

Perhaps most powerfully, however, these stories call us to reframe our understanding of the destruction inflicted by the war. Particularly, the psychological damage, devastation, and death wreaked on women.ix Elizabeth Stuart Phelps observed keenly the omnipresence of “sorrowing women” across the nation—“whose misery crowded the land.”x In keeping with the popular gothic tropes of the day, writers often romanticized women’s grief. See, for example, A. L. Soule’s account of the death of “Miss Blaine,” who he said succumbed to a broken heart following the death of her lover in the cavalry. Another correspondent claimed the ghost of a woman led him to the grave of Robert H. Lane, who was killed in the Battle of Chantilly. He later learned the ghostly woman was Lane’s fiancé, who also died of a broken heart.

As the most divisive and deadly event in US history, the Civil War forever altered the lives of its survivors and the cultural landscape of the nation. It encouraged Americans, who already embraced the supernatural as an important element of their culture, to popularize ghost stories as a means of examining the unsettling legacies of the war. Whether they brought readers any degree of closure is hard to say, but their prevalence indicates the extent of suffering the Civil War inflicted.


i J. David Hacker, “A Census-Based Count of the Civil War Dead,” Civil War History vol. 57, no. 4 (December 2011), 307–348.

ii Elizabeth Stuart Phelps, Chapters From a Life (Boston and New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Company, 1896), 96–97.

iii Plymouth [In.] Tribune, February 7, 1907.

iv See John R. Neff, Honoring the Civil War Dead (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2005); Faust, This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War (New York: Vintage, 2009).

v Crompton B. Burton, “‘Let Every Comrade Lend Us a Hand’: George E. Lemon and the National Tribune in James Marten and Caroline E. Janney, Buying and Selling Civil War Memory in Gilded Age America (Athens: The University of Georgia Press, 2021), 68, 69. See also Brian Matthew Jordan, Marching Home: Union Veterans and Their Unending Civil War (New York: Liveright, 2014), 75–79; Steven E. Sodergren, “‘Exposing False History’: The Voice of the Union Veteran in the Pages of the National Tribune” in Brian Matthew Jordan and Evan C. Rothera, eds. The War Went On: Reconsidering the Lives of Civil War Veterans (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2020), 137, 139.

vi Steven E. Sodergren, “‘Exposing False History’: The Voice of the Union Veteran in the Pages of the National Tribune” in The War Went On: Reconsidering the Lives of Civil War Veterans, eds. Brian Matthew Jordan and Evan C. Rothera (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2020), 143–144.

vii Neff, Honoring the Civil War Dead, 5; Caroline E. Janney, Remembering the Civil War: Reunion and the Limits of Reconciliation (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2013), 5–7; Nina Silber, The Romance of Reunion: Northerners and the South, 1865–1900 (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1993), 162; Paul H. Buck, The Road to Reunion, 1865–1900 (New York: Vintage, 1927), 310, 318–319.

viii See Stephanie McCurry, Women’s War: Fighting and Surviving the Civil War (Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2019).

ix Lisa Tendrich Frank, “The Union War on Women” in The Guerrilla Hunters: Irregular Conflicts during the Civil War (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2017), 174–175.

x Phelps, 97.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Banasik (ed.): "CONFEDERATE "TALES OF THE WAR IN THE TRANS-MISSISSIPPI, Part One: 1861"

Confederate Tales of the War
(Click on image for link to book page)

[Confederate "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi, Part One: 1861 edited by Michael E. Banasik (Camp Pope Publishing, 2010). Softcover, 5 maps, photos, illustrations, notes, appendices, bibliography, index. 230 Pages. ISBN: 978-1-929919-22-2 $17.95]

Confederate "Tales of the War" in the Trans-Mississippi is the seventh volume in Camp Pope Publishing's1 landmark Unwritten Chapters of the Civil War West of the River series (edited by Michael Banasik). Volume VII also serves as the beginning of a sub-series comprised of Civil War reminiscences published by the newspaper Missouri Republican (St. Louis) between 1885 and 18872. It compiles Trans-Mississippi theater writings dealing only with 1861 events penned by Confederates and members of the pro-Confederate Missouri State Guard.

The focus of the articles is on military and political persons and events (with heavy emphasis on battles). Some are defensive in tone and others are corrective, and there's a good combination of personal perspective along with the desire to engage other accounts in order to promote a more accurate (in their view) overall picture of events.

Multiple perspectives on the Dug Springs, Wilson's Creek (Oak Hills), "Zagyoni's Charge", Belmont, Salem, and Mt. Zion Church battles are offered by men of all ranks, and many of the writings are quite detailed. Belmont is heavily represented, but the Wilson's Creek material occupies the greatest amount of space, and the compilation will be especially helpful for those readers interested in the actions and whereabouts of units and individuals during the hard fought battle's opening moments. Also, many of the pieces are from Missouri State Guard officers, making them important source material for those researching the military history of that understudied militia organization.

Editor Michael Banasik's explanatory footnotes are drawn from multiple sources, and are noteworthy for their depth in background, context, and analysis. The small scale tactical overviews and the biographical sketches (of both famous and obscure figures) that are contained in these notes are immensely useful products of deep research. By piecing together the former, one can gain an excellent overall understanding of the historical course of the battle. Having this all laid out promotes a much deeper appreciation by the reader of the strengths and deficiencies of the original writer's understanding of events. The illuminating synergy of notes and text is perhaps best exemplified in the sections on Zagyoni's Charge, Salem, and Mt. Zion Church, all of which present obscure and/or controversial events in a readily comprehensible fashion.

The maps are a mixture of previously published and author-created line drawings. Although not quite as extensive as those found in previous volumes, the appendices provide additional material in the way of biographies, some official correspondence, a casualty list, and a listing of 1861 "Tales of the War" pieces either not used or previously published elsewhere. A bibliography and index complete the work.

Volume VII is yet another groundbreaking addition to a mature series of great value to the historiography of the Civil War in the Trans-Mississippi theater. Michael Banasik has outdone himself yet again with his skillful and generous editorial handiwork. Highly recommended.

Notes:
1 - This volume was still printed under the Press of the Camp Pope Bookshop label.
2 - Originally published in the Missouri Republican on Saturdays, there are 94 newspaper pieces in all. II and III will cover Confederate writings from 1862-1865, and later volumes will include those from Union participants.



Camp Pope Publishing

Wednesday, December 11, 2019

Review - "Mark Twain's Civil War: 'The Private History of a Campaign That Failed'" by Benjamin Griffin, ed.

[Mark Twain's Civil War: "The Private History of a Campaign That Failed" edited by Benjamin Griffin (Heyday Books, 2019). Hardcover, photos, maps, illustrations, notes, bibliography. Pages:viii,185. ISBN:978-1-59714-478-0. $25]

The growth of humorist Mark Twain's fame during the latter half of the nineteenth century was accompanied by increased public interest in exactly what he did during the Civil War. To serve this wider curiosity as well as offer something different to their "Memoranda on the Civil War" series readership, the editors of The Century magazine solicited an article from Twain, which was published in 1885 under the title "The Private History of a Campaign That Failed." The mixed reception was clearly not what Century editors Clarence Buel and Robert Underwood Johnson (and likely Twain himself) expected and controversy ensued. Happily for today's audience, the full story behind Twain's fictionalized account of his brief Civil War service can now be found in Benjamin Griffin's fascinating new study Mark Twain's Civil War.

In June 1861, in response to the growing military crisis in Missouri, Mark Twain left his job as a Mississippi River steamboat pilot and joined the pro-southern Missouri State Guard. A fanciful portrait of his fortnight spent as a soldier, Twain's "The Private History of a Campaign That Failed" told the story of the Ralls County Rangers in a humorous manner that mixed fact with fiction. While numbering only a handful of men, the Rangers dutifully elected officers (Twain was the outfit's second lieutenant) and generally bumbled around the countryside west of Hannibal with no real sense of purpose and even less discipline. By the end of two weeks, many of the Rangers had had enough of soldier life and half of them (including Twain) abandoned the cause. Like many other conflicted men who sought to sit out the rest of the war by going out West, Twain joined his brother in California and Nevada. The rest is history.

Mark Twain Project editor Benjamin Griffin's lengthy introductory essay does a very fine job of placing Twain's Missouri war service in its proper historical context. Twain's relationship with The Century magazine is also informatively explored, as is the public's reception of Twain's contribution to the magazine's celebrated series of diverse firsthand accounts later collected in the four-volume Battles & Leaders of the Civil War (1887-1888). Griffin's illuminating introduction, supported by his footnotes and additional explanatory endnotes, represents the scholarly literature's best effort at teasing verifiable truth from Twain's always-changing personal story of that elusive fortnight. Indeed, all such interpretive efforts are hampered by the fact that precious few accounts were written by Twain associates or the people he encountered in the field. Twain also intentionally muddied his own waters by altering the names of persons and places. Making the best of those limitations, Griffin's diligent research effectively uses what documents are available to sort through fact and fiction, exploring what can be known or inferred regarding Twain's motivations and also identifying or making educated guesses about the persons, places, and events of "The Private History."

One of the most interesting aspects of Griffin's investigation is his exploration of the public reaction to Twain's tale. Griffin astutely notes that the nature of Twain's account (which included bushwhacker-type irregular warfare) opened him up to public criticism from both ends of the sectional spectrum. In addition to his very public postwar repudiation of the Confederate cause, Twain's wartime desertion could not have endeared himself to all Confederate veterans (including some of his fellow rangers) and their supporters, many of whom suffered greatly during the war. On the other side, many pro-Union veterans and civilians were incensed to discover that Twain had been a "guerrilla" (southern irregular fighters of all kinds were commonly lumped into the same category as the most notorious bushwhackers). Twain's weak claim that his service merely represented a youthful indiscretion also held little weight with many Union veterans who were officers entrusted with real life and death responsibilities at ages less than Twain's 24. That Twain's tale included his own participation in the nighttime ambush and killing of an unarmed rider only further fueled the flames. Even the story's eloquently expressed regret and sorrow for the incident failed to move many critics.

The book's inclusion of the full text of "The Private History of a Campaign That Failed" (along with its original maps and illustrations) is also accompanied by a pair of very insightful appendices. The first, a transcription of a Twain speech in front of a Hartford, CT military organization, well illustrates the differing versions of his Missouri service that Twain presented during his lifetime. Even more interesting is the second appendix. It is famed Confederate spy and mail runner Absalom Grimes's account of his Ranger service with Twain, first published in the St. Louis Missouri Republican's "Tales of the War" series [Sidenote: The Grimes article was intentionally left out of the 1861 volume of Camp Pope Publishing's edited collection of "Tales of the War" articles due to its having been published elsewhere. This was an unfortunate editorial decision, as having another annotated version of Grimes's account might have been useful for purposes of comparison]. In the "Tales" article, Grimes points out the many errors he believes Twain to have committed to print while also offering his own account of the period that additionally reveals the real names behind Twain's fictionalized ones. Interestingly, Grimes categorically disputes Twain's story of the nighttime killing of the unarmed man, asserting that the only living thing shot by the Rangers during the fortnight was a horse under similar circumstances. Griffin's own research uncovered no corroborating evidence of Twain's version of the shooting event, judiciously concluding that we will likely never now the truth. Largely because of this part of Twain's story, the Century editors considered "The Private History" so controversial that they didn't include it in the first edition of B&L.

For those interested in "The Private History of a Campaign That Failed" along with an investigation into its publication, historical context, and veracity that possesses the highest degree of scholarly merit, Mark Twain's Civil War is the new standard. Highly recommended.

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Phillips, ed. : "TORN BY WAR: The Civil War Journal of Mary Adelia Byers"

[Torn by War: The Civil War Journal of Mary Adelia Byers edited by Samuel R. Phillips (University of Oklahoma Press, 2013). Softcover, 3 maps, photos, illustrations, notes, appendices, index. 253 pp. ISBN:978-0-8061-4395-8 $19.95]

Teenager Mary Adelia Byers begins her Civil War journal with the Union occupation of Batesville, Arkansas in May 1862. Byers correctly saw that the arrival of Union forces was a seminal event affecting personal, family, and community fortunes and was determined to document the experience. For the rest of the war (with the exception of 1865's single entry and a long period of malarial illness the previous year), she was a steady chronicler of events.  Edited by Samuel Phillips, this remarkable first person record has been published under the title Torn by War: The Civil War Journal of Mary Adelia Byers.

What becomes immediately apparent to the reader of the Mary Byers journal is the deep level of self-knowledge for such a young person (she was only 15 in 1862) and how clearly, confidently, and well she articulates her thoughts and feelings. While Mary often decries her own silliness in social situations, neglectfulness in household duties, etc., the opposite impression of her character emerges from her writing. Throughout the journal, she maturely documents her sincere struggle with Christian faith and the internal and external pressures to publicly embrace organized religion by joining a local congregation. The manner in which she handles her suitors (though with the occasional outburst of teenage caprice), soberly evaluates the romantic attachments of others in her social group, and deals with difficult relatives demonstrate wisdom beyond her years.

Slavery is mentioned very little, though her widowed mother [Mary's father, John Hancock Byers, died before the war] had a maid and family benefactor Uncle William was a slaveholder. When news of the Emancipation Proclamation spread, the slaves became unruly to such a degree that they were given the ultimatum to either stay or leave. Unsurprisingly, they departed service, with the journal treating with little fanfare and seemingly few regrets what most whites at the time considered shocking social upheaval.

With many southern civilian Civil War diaries and journals full of tales of privation and destruction, the Byers family and circle of friends appear to have escaped the worst experiences of those with pro-Confederate allegiances in the occupied South. Beyond passing note of some fencing lost to a nearby Union encampment, Byers does not mention any serious property loss or really any substantial want in food, clothing, and shelter. It undoubtedly helped that they adopted proven self-preservation measures, among them not resisting Union soldier visits and boarders. In fact, the Confederate Arkansans's Missouri allies end up being the primary targets of abuse, especially from the disliked Byers cousin Henry. No one explains why in their minds Missourians were deserving of such vitriolic disdain, but readers familiar with the Arkansas Civil War primary source literature recognize the posture as by no means rare.  The irony that thousands of Missouri soldiers risked their lives defending the very Arkansas homes of those so loudly voicing such views went apparently unappreciated. The negative feeling reached far beyond mere state rivalry and one wonders how seriously the animosity damaged cooperative defense of the upper reaches of the Confederate Trans-Mississippi department.

Even though it was a military event that sparked the beginning of the Byers journal, little thought and content are directed toward the movements of nearby armies, or the campaigns and battles fought elsewhere. Perhaps this is to be expected from the personal journal of a teenage girl likely more interested in other things, but those seeking such information are advised to look elsewhere. Editor Phillips makes heavy use in his contextual footnotes of Freeman Mobley's Making Sense of the Civil War in Batesville-Jacksonport and Northeast Arkansas 1861-1874 (2005)*, and that wouldn't be a bad starting point.

Though the array of source material utilized for annotation is not exhaustive, the editorial package overall is more than solid. To help readers keep track of the diary's often bewildering cast of friends, acquaintances, and family members, Phillips assembles a helpful Byers family tree and descriptive list of individuals roughly in order of first appearance in Byers's writing. Of the trio of maps, the one depicting Batesville and environs is very helpful in locating places mentioned in the diary. Phillips was also able to collect a good number of photographs of Byers family and friends. The four appendices reproduce interesting published articles and reports. They include a collection of federal army impressions of Batesville, a Civil War-centric history of the Catalpa Hall estate built by William Byers, brief biographical material on Judge Byers, and some accounts of the February 1864 skirmish at Waugh's Farm. It's all very relevant and worthwhile local history.

Torn By War
is a rich personal account of the middle class Confederate civilian experience in a geographically isolated, yet militarily contested, region (NE Arkansas and the town of Batesville) not often addressed in the published Civil War literature. Its value is only enhanced by the precociously perceptive nature of young Mary Byers and her unusually expressive writing. Indeed, social historians would do well to add this journal to any bibliography hosting the finest examples of female Civil War diarists, journal writers, and correspondents.


* - This somewhat flawed but useful book was briefly discussed on this site [here], and was also reissued recently under a new title Civil War!: A Missing Piece of the Puzzle Northeast Arkansas 1861-1874.


More CWBA reviews of UOP titles:
* Columns of Vengeance: Soldiers, Sioux, and the Punitive Expeditions, 1863-1864
* Los Angeles in Civil War Days, 1860-1865
* Historical Atlas of Oklahoma, 4th edition
* George Crook: From the Redwoods to Appomattox
* Violent Encounters: Interviews on Western Massacres
* A Perfect Gibraltar: The Battle for Monterrey, Mexico, 1846
* Patrick Connor's War: The 1865 Powder River Indian Expedition (Arthur H. Clark)
* Texas: A Historical Atlas
* Civil War Arkansas 1863: The Battle for a State
* Jayhawkers: The Civil War Brigade of James Henry Lane
* Powder River Odyssey: Nelson Cole's Western Campaign of 1865 the Journals of Lyman G. Bennett and Other Eyewitness Accounts (Arthur H. Clark)
* Three Days in the Shenandoah: Stonewall Jackson at Front Royal and Winchester
* The Uncivil War: Irregular Warfare In The Upper South, 1861-1865
* The Civil War in Arizona: The Story of the California Volunteers, 1861-1865

Thursday, August 15, 2024

Review - "New Fields of Adventure: The Writings of Lyman G. Bennett, Civil War Soldier and Topographical Engineer, 1861–1865" by M. Jane Johansson, editor

[New Fields of Adventure: The Writings of Lyman G. Bennett, Civil War Soldier and Topographical Engineer, 1861–1865 edited by M. Jane Johansson (University of Tennessee Press, 2024). Softcover, maps, photos, illustrations, endnotes, bibliography, index. Pages main/total:xxiv,298/399. ISBN:978-1-62190-861-6. $39.95]

Big picture investigation of Civil War military engineering has drawn increased attention from scholars over the past quarter century. Given the viewpoint expressed in his book Engineering Victory: How Technology Won the Civil War (2016), Thomas Army is arguably the most vigorous proponent of the idea that the vast disparity between North and South in the areas of formal engineering education, practitioner pools, technology, and resources was a primary (and even perhaps the key) factor in Union victory. While Army's case is compelling on a number of levels, it is also clear through studies such as Larry Daniel's Engineering in the Confederate Heartland (2022) and Saxon Bisbee's Engines of Rebellion: Confederate Ironclads and Steam Engineering in the American Civil War (2018) that impressive feats of military engineering effort and skill were not entirely beyond the limited capabilities of the South. Examples of relatively recent works focusing on military engineering's role during specific campaigns are Earl Hess's excellent series of books published between 2005 and 2018 that cover field fortifications in the eastern theater and the western theater's Atlanta Campaign. Justin Solonick's Engineering Victory: The Union Siege of Vicksburg (2015) is equally insightful. Histories of specialized engineering units have also emerged during this time, two examples being Mark Hoffman's "My Brave Mechanics": The First Michigan Engineers and Their Civil War (2007) and Patterson's Independent Company of Engineers and Mechanics 1861-1865 (2020) by Charles Bogart.

Scholarly editing and publication of the writings of Union engineers is another major feature of this expanding body of literature. Correspondence from one of the war's most celebrated military engineers can be studied through Paul Taylor's My Dear Nelly: The Selected Civil War Letters of General Orlando M. Poe to His Wife Eleanor (2020). Also in 2020, University of Tennessee Press published A Volunteer in the Regulars: The Civil War Journal and Memoir of Gilbert Thompson, US Engineer Battalion (edited by Mark Smith) through their Voices of the Civil War series. Another Voices title of similar vein is the subject of this review, M. Jane Johansson's New Fields of Adventure: The Writings of Lyman G. Bennett, Civil War Soldier and Topographical Engineer, 1861–1865. Johansson's volume possesses the added distinction of being the rare military engineering volume centered on the Trans-Mississippi theater, not only Missouri, Arkansas, and Kansas but the Great Plains and Mountain West as well.

Married at the end of 1859 and a father by the outbreak of the Civil War, Connecticut-born Illinoisan Lyman Gibson Bennett derived the bulk of his personal income from surveying, an in-demand skill that would place him in good stead during the coming conflict. He enlisted in the Thirty-Sixth Illinois, and by the fall of 1861 found himself in Rolla, Missouri, a town located at the terminus of the Southwestern Branch of the Pacific Railroad. Rolla's location made it one of the state's most strategically important posts, and Bennett's surveying skills were immediately put to use in the construction of Fort Lyman and in mapping the surrounding countryside. Johansson very aptly describes Bennett's writing style as being similar to a "travelogue." Indeed, Bennett's engaging prose combined with his lengthy and highly detailed descriptions of physical distances between points of interest, the weather, the natural landscape (and its most prominent geographical features), habitations, and developmental improvements are a prime feature of all of his writings and serve as a veritable goldmine of historical information for today's readers and scholars. Perhaps only the late John Bradbury, the foremost expert on Civil War Rolla, could have told us for certain, but it seems likely that Bennett's extensive diary of this period is the most notable single source behind our knowledge of the critical early-war period in and around that center of transportation and military occupation. Significantly, unlike so many other Civil War diary, letter, and journal writers, Bennett was also very willing to 'talk shop,' detailing for readers the instruments he used and processes he followed for accurately estimating distances, laying out fortifications, and platting out the countryside for military use.

Soon, Bennett's engineering skills brought him to the attention of higher ups, and after a brief hospital stay in St. Louis he returned to active service, rejoining his regiment as it crossed into northwest Arkansas with General Samuel Curtis's Army of the Southwest. In addition to describing the increasing levels of devastating observed during his march to the front, during which he was also detailed to lead a side expedition, Bennett also offers very extensive eyewitness accounts of the battles of Bentonville and Pea Ridge. In hailing Bennett's account of his experiences during the Battle of Pea Ridge, Johansson is certainly not exaggerating the depth and significance of it as one of the most enlightening ones written by a soldier serving in the ranks. His regiment, the Thirty-Sixth Illinois, was a key contributor to Union success in the highly consequential Oberson's Field sector on March 7, 1862. There, its skirmishers essentially decapitated the Confederate high command in that area of the sprawling battlefield by killing in close succession generals Ben McCulloch and second in command James McIntosh. An admirer of General Franz Sigel, Bennett also vividly describes his regiment's participation in the March 8 counterattack that routed the Confederate army and produced, by many accounts, Sigel's best day as a Civil War general. After the battle Bennett formally joined Curtis's staff and performed topographical engineering duties during the army's long march across northern Arkansas.

Returning to St. Louis to finalize his maps, Bennett became bored with department headquarters desk work and received a commission to raise troops in northwest Arkansas. His two-part memoir "Recruiting in Dixie," written in the 1870s, vividly recounts his dangerous entry and recruitment adventures in that guerrilla-infested part of the state, where anti-Confederate "Mounted Feds" enlisted and fought in large numbers. While tall tales of enemy atrocities abound, readers nevertheless gain a clear sense of the societal breakdown that occurred in a mountainous region where lethal violence was common on and off the battlefield and household neutrality impossible to maintain. Bennett eventually was promoted to major of the Fourth Arkansas Cavalry (US), and his writings offer useful firsthand perspectives on operations in the area. Hand in hand with those accounts are rather sharp opinions of the region's backwardness (at least in comparison to his own views of elevated civilization). Citing what he felt to have been "unjust prejudice against northern officers" (pg. 232), Bennett resigned his commission near the end of 1864.

In 1865, Bennett returned to the war, this time as a civilian contract engineer. As his diaries reveal, Bennett surveyed battlefields from the recently concluded Price Expedition as well as government lands in eastern Kansas. Those intimately familiar with the atlas to the O.R. will immediately recognize the former. In a remarkable journey spanning, by Johansson's estimate, two thousand miles, Bennett then followed the overland trail across Nebraska and into Colorado (with a detour to observe the territory's gold fields). He also was sent on a mission to survey fortifications at Fort Laramie in Wyoming, Dakota Territory. Though those journeys were full of danger from Indian raids, extreme weather, and frontier privation, Bennett's typical curiosity and colorful travelogue style of writing remained intact. Finding no need to return to the Bennett material already well covered by another scholar [see David Wagner's Powder River Odyssey: Nelson Cole's Western Campaign of 1865 - The Journals of Lyman G. Bennett and Other Eyewitness Accounts (2009)], Johansson's examination ends in April 1865.

Johansson's professionalism in compiling, arranging, and editing the Bennett writings is exemplary. She puts her own considerable primary and secondary source research to good use in the volume's illuminating chapter introductions, the epilogue, and endnotes. The notes provide consistent source and background information on persons, places, and events described in Bennett's writing while also offering corrections to Bennett's factual mistakes. Johansson also makes sure to include as many of Bennett's surviving maps and drawings as possible, noting that copyright precluded reproduction of the artwork Bennett produced for his "Personal Reminiscences," one part of which was the aforementioned "Recruiting in Dixie."

Bennett's Civil War writings and Jane Johansson's expert editing of them for scholarly publication should draw interest from a broad range of readers, among them those concerned with the major military campaigns of the Trans-Mississippi West, the role of military engineering in both the conduct and historical documentation of those campaigns, and the hardships and military contributions of the Unionist minority in Arkansas. This fresh Voices of the Civil War series title is very highly recommended.

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

Author Q & A: James E. McGhee

Originally planned as a monthly or bi-monthly feature of CWBA, I've been neglecting interviews for far too long. Happily, I have the pleasure of reviving the author Q&A with James E. McGhee. We've never met, but have corresponded frequently over the past few years and Jim has always been very generous in helping me. He has written, compiled, and edited a number of invaluable works dealing with the Civil War in Missouri:
  • With Richard C. Peterson, Kip Lindberg, and Keith Daleen, Sterling Price's Lieutenants: A Guide to the Officers and Organization of the Missouri State Guard, 1861-1865 (Two Trails, new revised ed. 2007/2008).
  • ed., General M. Jeff Thompson's Letter Book July 1861-June 1862 (Two Trails Publishing, 2004).
  • Campaigning With Marmaduke: Narratives and Roster of the 8th Missouri Cavalry Regiment (Two Trails, 2002).
  • ed., Letter and Order Book, Missouri State Guard 1861-1862. (Two Trails, 2001).
  • Missouri Confederates: A Guide to Sources for Confederate Soldiers and Units 1861-1865 (Two Trails, 2001).
  • ed., Service with the Missouri State Guard: The Memoir of Brigadier General James Harding (Oak Hills Publishing, 2000).
  • ed., Voices of the Swamp Fox Brigade: Supplemental Letters, Order and Documents of General M. Jeff Thompson's Command, 1861-1862. (Blue and Grey Bookshop, 1999).
  • ed., "Tales of the War": A Series of Civil War Articles From the Daily Missouri Republican St. Louis, Missouri 1885-1887.
  • ed. with James R. Mayo., Stoddard Grays: Confederate Soldiers of Stoddard County, Missouri, 1861-1865. (Two Trails, 1995).
DW: Hello, Jim. Thanks for taking part in this little author Q&A session.

How long have you been researching the Civil War in Missouri? Has it always been your sole research interest?

JEM: Like most people probably, my interest in the war began by reading about the war in the east. In fact, I still read some books about the eastern theater. I stumbled across Jay Monaghan’s Civil War on the Western Border about 1964 or so while I was stationed at Lowery AFB in Denver. That sparked my interest in the war in Missouri. Thus, since the mid-1960s I have concentrated on the war in the Trans-Mississippi, especially the people and events in Missouri. I am completely fascinated with the subject.

DW:
Your latest book Guide to Missouri Confederate Units, 1861-1865 (U. of Ark. Press) is scheduled for release this April. What is it you wanted to accomplish with this project?

JEM: Missouri Confederate units are confusing to say the least. What I set out to do, and I hope I have succeeded, is to sort out the myths and realities of Missouri’s units, and to provide a brief historical summary of the service of each unit, that will assist historians and genealogists alike in their research.

DW: In what ways does your book go beyond the model of the Confederate state unit guide established by Art Bergeron's excellent Louisiana study and Stewart Sikakis' many volumes?

JEM: Sikafis’ books provide very little detail regarding the units he includes. My book, like Bergeron’s, gives more information on the organization, officers, casualties, etc., of each unit. As a matter of fact, I modeled my book after Bergeron’s, which I consider by far the best of the genre.

DW: Was it difficult to find a publisher? Was it your original intention to go with a university press?

JEM: I didn’t know if anyone would want to publish the manuscript! It never occurred to me that a university press would have any interest in it, so I considered a small press or even self-publishing. Dr. Bill Gurley, who co-edited the wonderful McPheeters diary published by the University of Arkansas Press, read my manuscript and suggested submitting it to Arkansas, since they publish the ”Civil War in the West” series. I was pleasantly surprised when the press accepted the manuscript for publication.

DW: You once told me you try to obtain a copy of every book published about the CW in Missouri for your home library. I won't ask you to pick favorites, but could you briefly discuss a few books you have found to be excellent, but remain most undeservedly obscure even to those well steeped in the Missouri literature?

JEM: A fairly recent release, Fishing in Deep River: Civil War Memoir of Private Samuel Baldwin Dunlap, C.S.A., despite its unfortunate title, is a wonderful memoir of a northwest Missouri soldier that recounts his experiences in the Guard and as an artilleryman with the 1st Missouri Brigade. Daniel Joseph Plaster’s Marmaduke’s First Missouri Raid, 1862-1863: The Roles of Federal Scouts and Outposts in the Defense of Springfield, is a fine study of small unit operations during General Marmaduke’s initial raid into Missouri. Finally, Gary Scheel’s, Sixty-Six Miles in Thirty-Nine Hours: The Retreat from Fort Davidson, Pilot Knob to the Battle of Leasburg, provides an interesting account of a little known incident connected to the battle at Pilot Knob.

DW: Great, I'll definitely need to visit those first two.

Interestingly, you mention in the intro to your MSG order book compilation that there is far more source material available than is commonly believed (albeit widely scattered). Where are the best places to look for primary source material related to the MSG?

JEM: The Missouri State Archives, the Western Historical Manuscript Collection at the various campuses of the University of Missouri, the Missouri Historical Society (St. Louis), Wilson’s Creek National Battlefield Park, various county historical societies in Missouri, and in private hands. Quite frankly, if I might promote another of my projects, the best starting place for locating Missouri State Guard resources is the extensive bibliography of the Guard in the second edition of Sterling Price’s Lieutenants.

DW: As a long time observer and contributor, what project would you most like to see? On a similar note, what do you feel is the most neglected subject in the literature?

JEM: I would love to see a single volume history of the war in Missouri, biographies of Samuel Curtis and Francis M. Cockrell, and comprehensive studies of the siege of Lexington and Price’s Expedition of 1864 (from the beginning to the bitter end!). As for neglected subjects, there is a serious dearth of modern regimental histories of Missouri units, both Union and Confederate.

DW: And of the good ones that do exist, none that I can recall are of regiments that did not do the bulk of their service in the western theater. I have high hopes for Michael Gillespie's ongoing Lexington project.

For me, the Missouri State Guard is the most fascinating Civil War period military organization. My personal dream project would be a complete military history of the MSG. Given your knowledge of the available source material, would such a project be feasible?

JEM: I believe it is. There are some aspects of the Guard that are short on primary materials, the battle of Athens being one, but I think that a comprehensive history of the Guard could and should be done. There are many important resources available that have never been used by historians.

DW: What is your biggest lament in terms of the overall state of scholarship dealing with CW Missouri?

JEM: Initially, the lack of interest in the war in Missouri by most professional historians in the state is absolutely shameful. Non-academics have accomplished much of the research and writing about the war in Missouri over the past several years. Secondly, the emphasis on guerrilla warfare in the state has been overdone to the detriment of other aspects of the conflict. How many more times must we ride with Quantrill and Bloody Bill? I, for one, am extremely saddle-sore.

DW: Along with the overemphasis issue, much of the output dealing with the guerrilla war aspects continues to be unhelpful (to put it kindly) as well. It is my hope that University of Missouri Press will someday champion a broader and deeper contribution to Missouri CW literature, similar to the effort Tennessee is doing for the western theater and Appalachia.

What are you working on now?

JEM: I am currently working on a compilation of first hand accounts of the battles of the Missouri State Guard. Tentatively titled "A Missouri State Guard Reader".

DW: That sounds like it would be a great resource. Thanks again for your time, Jim, and for giving me some new ideas to mull over and books to find.

Readers, if you'd like to purchase a copy of the new edition of Sterling Price's Lieutenants, go to the publisher's website (link-scroll down). Also, keep an eye out for the April 08 release of Jim's Guide to Missouri Confederate Units, 1861-1865 (U. of Arkansas Press). As always, I will keep you posted.